The New Yorker meditates on Miyazaki
The genius behind such films as My Neighbor Totoro and Spirited Away is the subject of discussion in an online exclusive at The New Yorker this week.
Assault on Precinct 13 (2005)
[This review was originally published in January 2005 at Christianity Today.]
-
Soon after the opening credits of director Jean–François Richet's Assault on Precinct 13, a gangster resembling Morpheus from The Matrix sits down near the back of a crowded church. The morning's sermon is a simple lesson: "Cherish your power to choose the righteous path."
This cynical churchgoer quickly disobeys. The church is quickly thrown into chaos. As the Detroit police close in for his capture, a series of events is set in motion that begins with a dead body in the sanctuary and concludes with corpses strewn all through a police precinct in the dead of a snow–buried night.
Richet, formerly a rap music producer, makes his first prominent American movie into an unremarkable, even dismaying, event—just another generically hyperviolent and overbearing genre flick. He's chosen to remake a 1976 action film by one of the kings of B–movies—John Carpenter—who went on to direct Halloween, Escape from New York, The Thing, and They Live. But instead of improving on Carpenter's film, he's only succeeded in making it a wearying assault on the eyes, ears, and intelligence.
Carpenter's Assault took a disrespected rookie policeman, some secretaries and cops, and some jailed crooks—including a notorious killer on death row—and he penned them all up in a police precinct on the night before its closure. Due to the office's imminent shutdown, the usual staff and supplies were unavailable. Our heroes were left to crouch behind desks while an army of zombie–like street gang members closed in from all sides. Fast, lean, efficient, and shockingly violent (for the time), this original Assault developed a few memorable characters with sparse, potent dialogue. Part exploitation–film, part Rio Bravo, it remains an amusing B–movie indulgence.
Richet's version of the film changes everything but the set. Once again, a bus transporting some prisoners is forced to make a detour—this time due to a closed road instead of a sick prisoner—and the criminals are locked up in the nearby precinct to wait out the storm. Again, Precinct 13, which has a remarkably similar layout to the original, is almost empty. And, just as before, men with guns advance out of the night and surround it. Over the course of the crisis, we become as acquainted with that building as Bruce Willis did with his Die Hard skyscraper.
But where Carpenter's film was effective in its simplicity and focus, Richet has overburdened the skeletal plot, giving several characters heavy emotional baggage and spoiling the nightmarish suspense by revealing the motivation of the heavily armed troops attacking the precinct. Carpenter's film turned up the tension by keeping the motivations of the murderous, multi–ethnic gang members mysterious. Richet casts the invaders as cops gone bad, closing in with body armor and night–vision, trying to kill one of the jailed crooks before he reveals what he knows about police corruption.
Desperately trying to hold down the fort, even as he realizes that he's up against his own colleagues, Officer Jake Roenick (Ethan Hawke) must keep his unlucky companions supplied with bullets and manage the tense relationships between the "good guys" and the crooks he turns loose.
Not all of the revisions are mistakes. While Carpenter's precinct was isolated in a ghost town of an L.A. neighborhood, Richet effectively isolates the precinct with a paralyzing snowstorm, making it almost impossible for help to get in or heroes to get out.
But where Carpenter slowly developed suspense and tension, Rivet's version is simply violent. The first instance of a bullet through the head happens not even five minutes into the film. Soon, the audience is applauding for stabbings and chests blown out by grenades. Richet's action lacks creativity. When we see a dagger–like icicle within the reach of combatants fighting in the snow, we have time both to figure out how the fight will end and to remember where we've seen this before—Die Hard 2. The clichés comes as fast as the bullets. Mexican standoffs. The conveniently forgotten escape route. Exchanges like, "It's quiet out there." "That's what worries me." Something smell fishy? Probably another red herring. And it all comes down to a dispiriting conclusion, in which the chief villain turns clumsy and forgetful.
Carpenter's film ran on his own simple, wire–taut synthesizer theme; Richet drowns the action in what sounds like a three–car pile–up of orchestral suspense soundtracks, and he wraps it up with a deafening rap song in which the singers praise the movie, singing lines like, "Wow! What a conclusion!" Cinematographer Robert Gantz seems to think he's solely responsible for creating a sense of excitement, jerking the camera around so wildly that we're left dizzy and disoriented. Carpenter wrote, directed, edited, and scored his Assault; Richet clearly needed a lot help for his.
Kudos to the cast for making the most of it. Hawke fully commits to the poorly written role of Roenick, a cop sinking into sarcasm and regret after losing his partners in a drug bust. It's been amazing to see that timid youngster from Dead Poets Society grow up to become Training Day's tough trainee and Before Sunset's philosophical romantic. Here, Hawke makes some awful dialogue sound pretty good, and he's convincing in his desperate attempts to improvise order in the midst of chaos.
Brian Dennehy turns up as Jasper, an "old school" cop on the verge of retirement. Jasper's disgust at having to join forces with a cop killer becomes the film's most volatile element. (But how many times does the script require him to say "scumbag"? I lost count.)
The crooks—both the hunted and the hunters—are well–chosen too. Laurence Fishburne smolders as Bishop, the crime boss in handcuffs. And John Leguizamo is memorably zany as Beck, a nervous junkie with a steady supply of punchlines. (A cop says, "Your eyes are red; are you stoned?" Beck snaps back, "Your eyes are glazed; you been eatin' donuts?") Outside the precinct walls, all Gabriel Byrne gets to do is scowl, playing the cold–hearted chief of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Squad, Marcus Duvall.
The poor ladies trapped inside serve as little more than sex objects. Drea de Matteo of TV's Joey is Iris, who rambles on incessantly about her sex life. Her big scene arrives when she partners with Bishop and his language of violence turns out to be her idea of foreplay. Lovely.
Maria Bello plays Roenick's therapist, who stops by for a late–night session on her way to a New Year's Eve party. How convenient—she's established as a smart lady, but when the action gets going she'll strip down to her party dress. And of course, it turns out that therapists are obsessive–compulsives themselves, boosting their egos by advising neurotic cops. Bello, a fine actress, is reduced to shivering in the corner, vulnerable and lost, while the audience wonders what happened to the winter coat she was wearing when she came in.
Thus, it seems our heroes are only slightly less despicable than the villains. This movie's idea of a courageous moral stand is Roenick's vow that, when this is over, he "can't let a murderer walk out of here." Like a stepstool in a deep pit, that's as good as moral high ground gets in this film, folks.
It's troubling to see a film so willingly whipping the audience into a frenzy by casting cops as bad guys. In fact, the whole film might have been crafted to exploit current anti–government sympathies. Where Carpenter insists his original Assault was "apolitical," Richet's film easily reads as a crude indictment of the current administration.
Think about it: The authorities tolerate the existence of a warlord because he serves their purposes. But when they realize he is capable of implicating them in some shady dealings of their own, they manipulate the media and close in to eliminate him, painting themselves as heroes ridding the world of a tyrant while they cover their bloody tracks. Bishop describes Duvall as "one of those nervous God fearin' types." Peering out at the encroaching police, Beck quips, "Government thugs abusing their authority again? I feel real safe, man."
But if this is intended as political commentary, we must acknowledge the sort of intellect offering the editorial—one that relies on caricatures and clichés, and uses relentless expletives as blunt instruments to whack us into submission. Meanwhile, the filmmakers positively worship artillery and they dish out the grisly payback scenes with reckless abandon. It's not wrong to question authority, but it's not helpful to throw fuel on the fire of anti–authoritarian sympathies by portraying police as valid target practice for men with guns.
By the umpteenth time Iris the "Sexy" whimpers, "What the [bleep] are we supposed to do?" the answer has become obvious to the viewer. Walk away. Or, to alter a line from that ill–fated sermon at the opening of the film—"Cherish your power to choose a worthwhile movie."
The 2005 Arts and Faith Film Critics Circle Awards - Nominations
For those who don't know, the Arts and Faith Film Critics Circle is a fellowship of critics applying Christian perspectives to film through reviews and discussion, seeking to encourage revealing and intelligent dialogue about the human experience.
Formely the Promontory Film Critics Circle, this four-year-old association changed its name, updated its membership requirements, and revised its mission statement this year. Now under the name The Arts and Faith Film Critics Circle ... due to our debates and discussions at www.ArtsandFaith.com ... we've voted and chosen our nominees for our fourth annual film awards.
Many, many thanks to the critics who participated in the reformation of the [AFC]2 this year, and who contributed their votes for the best things they saw this year. (To see a current list of participating critics, click here.)
Here are the results, listed alphabetically.
Now, [AFC]2 critics have two weeks to try and catch up with those that they have missed before the final votes are collected.
NOMINEES FOR THE ARTS AND FAITH FILM CRITICS CIRCLE'S 2005 FILM AWARDS
MOST SIGNIFICANT EXPLORATION OF SPIRITUAL ISSUES
(Due to a four-way tie for fifth place, there are EIGHT nominees instead of five.)
Dogville
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Finding Neverland
The Passion of the Christ
The Return
The Sea Inside
Time of the Wolf
Twilight Samurai
BEST NARRATIVE FILM
Dogville
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
The Incredibles
The Passion of the Christ
Vera Drake
BEST DOCUMENTARY
(Due to a tie, there are six nominees instead of five.)
Control Room
Fahrenheit 9/11
The Five Obstructions
The Story of the Weeping Camel
Supersize Me
Touching the Void
BEST ACTOR
Jim Carrey - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Don Cheadle - Hotel Rwanda
Leonardo DiCaprio - The Aviator
Jamie Foxx - Ray
Paul Giamatti - Sideways
BEST ACTRESS
Julie Delpy- Before Sunset
Nicole Kidman – Dogville
Imelda Stauton - Vera Drake
Hilary Swank - Million Dollar Baby
Kate Winslett- Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
(Due to a tie, there are six nominees instead of five.)
Morgan Freeman - Million Dollar Baby
John Hurt - Dogville (narrator)
Nick Nolte - Hotel Rwanda
Clive Owen - Closer
Mark Wahlberg – I Heart Huckabees
Peter Wight – Vera Drake
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Cate Blanchett - The Aviator
Alex Kelly - Vera Drake
Maia Morgenstern - The Passion of the Christ
Sophie Okenodo - Hotel Rwanda
Sharon Warren – Ray
BEST ENSEMBLE CAST
Dogville
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Mean Creek
Sideways
Vera Drake
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Brad Bird - The Incredibles
Charlie Kaufman - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Mike Leigh, et al. - Vera Drake
Vladimir Moiseyenko and Aleksandr Novototsky - The Return
Lars Von Trier – Dogville
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
Paul Haggis - Million Dollar Baby
Richard Linklater - Before Sunset
David Magee- Finding Neverland
Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor – Sideways
Daniel Pyne and Dean Georgaris - The Manchurian Candidate
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Hero
The Passion of the Christ
The Return
The Saddest Music in the World
Spring Summer Fall Winter ... and Spring
BEST DIRECTOR
Mel Gibson - The Passion of the Christ
Michel Gondry - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Michael Haneke – Time of the Wolf
Mike Leigh - Vera Drake
Lars Von Trier – Dogville
BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
Jon Brion - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
T Bone Burnett (and various artists) – The Ladykillers
Andrei Dergachyov – The Return
David Holmes – Ocean’s Twelve
John Powell - The Bourne Supremacy
BEST FAMILY FILM
(Due to a tie, there are six nominees instead of five.)
Finding Neverland
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
The Incredibles
Miracle
The Polar Express
The Story of the Weeping Camel
I'm very pleased with this list, although it's always hard to see favorites fall short by one or two votes. But this list represents a healthy diversity of interests and, um, "passions."
I'm sure you'll be stunned, as I am, by some inclusions AND some exclusions. But there they are. Such is the way of critics' lists. (A narrator for Best Supporting Actor? Wow! No "Flying Daggers" for cinematography? Wow!)
But I'm excited that I now have extra motivation to seek out some of the things I've missed. Anybody know if "Twilight Samurai" is readily available on DVD yet?
If you have any questions, let me know: LookingCloserReview@msn.com.
Is Ebert's Memory Failing?
UPDATE: It turns out that he was thinking of a scene from "Rick," a film that was out a couple of years ago, with Bill Pullman. Spooky. And, as a matter of fact, Ebert's review has now been corrected, and the mistakes are gone.
-
Roger Ebert's review of "In Good Company" is very very strange indeed.
(Kudos to Steven Greydanus for catching this bizarro review.)
First of all, he says,
It's about a corporate culture that tries to be evil and fails.
I've seen the movie, and I have no idea what this means.
Secondly, he recounts this scene:
"You're kind of a bizarrely honest guy," Carter tells Dan, who replies: "No, just around you."
Wrong. That conversation happens between Carter and Dan's daughter, Alex.
But then, the third problem, and it's a whopper!
There is a bizarre episode where Carter takes Dan out drinking, in a club where patrons can observe each other via closed-circuit TV, and then hurries back to his office to join an X-rated chat room.
This scene DOES NOT OCCUR in the film. And nothing even remotely resembling it takes place.
What's a Parable?
My friend Ron Reed happened to quote writer C.H. Dodd today in offering the definition of the word "parable." Ron referenced this in summing up the virtues of The Return, my favorite film of 2004.Read more
Dennis Quaid: Doing What Harrison Ford Failed to Do
For the last two decades, Harrison Ford has been so narrowly focused on action-hero movies and traditional romantic leading-man roles that he's accepted increasingly embarrassing projects. There have been the occasional experiments--"Presumed Innocent," and that awful romance with Kirsten Scott Thomas, but he's clearly shown that he needs help in selecting decent projects.
Dennis Quaid, on the other hand, has continued to improve as an actor, choosing good roles (with the occasional exception, like "Flight of the Phoenix"), delivering strong performances, and being willing to play a variety of characters and not try to hide his age. Instead of performing as Scarlett Johansson's lover, for example, he's quite happy just to play her DAD.
Scarlett Johansson hearts Dennis Quaid. And so do I.
Here's my review of In Good Company, his latest film, in which the REAL acting story is TOPHER GRACE ... who makes a remarkable debut as a leading man. But Quaid is excellent too, and the actors compliment each other perfectly.
So, what do you think? Maybe Quaid should inherit the role of Indiana Jones for the fourth film, since Ford hasn't done anything worth glancing at since Air Force One (and even that was below-par compared to Ford's glory days).
Frederick Buechner movie available
Looks like the film is finished. You can even watch the first fifteen minutes online.Read more
Million Dollar Baby Joins My 2004 Top Ten
This always happens. No sooner do I turn in my Top Ten list of 2004 to meet a deadline than I suddenly discover a film that changes everything.Read more