My Favorite 10 Minutes of David Letterman... Ever.

This interview was my favorite ten minutes of late-night talk show ever... this spontaneous, unpredictable David Letterman interview with Steve Martin about Roxanne, Bill Murray, and the fine art of pencil-throwing.

"And if you've ever been on the floor of a context..."

Oh, how I miss THAT Steve Martin.

It's also cool to see the commercials that came on during the break. And to consider that some of Dave's most creative stuff took place during the writers' strike.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaHs2V0XD8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAvxHAz7re8


It was 30 Years Ago Today Ben Kenobi Taught the Farmboy to Play

On May 25, 1977, Star Wars arrived.

I could wax nostalgic and tell you what that did to my seven-year-old imagination, how it changed my life, how it encouraged me to envision "a larger world" ... but I've told that story in Through a Screen Darkly.

I'd like to know your Star Wars story.

  • Where did you first see it?
  • With whom?
  • How old were you (if you're willing to share)?
  • What was your first impression?
  • How has your impression changed?
  • Did the movie have any kind of influence on your life and imagination?
  • Do you resent anything about it?
  • Did it do more harm than good to movie history?

And then, of course... the important questions:

  • Who's your favorite character?
  • What's your favorite line?
  • Visually, what's your favorite moment?
  • Did you buy Star Wars toys? If so, which was your favorite?
  • Do you still have them?

And finally, the most important question in the Star Wars universe:

  • Which film is the best, and which is the worst, in the six-film franchise?

A Few Words from Geoffrey S. Deweese

Stopped over at the blog of my dear friend Geoffrey Deweese, a military attorney stationed at Fort Lewis, Washington; husband of my longtime friend Melody Fields, and father of two newborn twins, and two more beautiful children.

I remember when Geoffrey wrote for Seattle Pacific's student newspaper. He has always been a guy with a heart as big or bigger than his formidable intellect. His job is challenging, and his courage is great. He and Melody are making a big difference in many ways.

Anyway, when I got to his blog, I found something I didn't expect, but probably should have. And it's given me the focus of my prayers here as I sign off for the night. Maybe it will give focus to your prayers as well.

And then I would suggest one small addendum as well: Pray also for those who oppose us, for those who would fire on our troops.


Farewell to the Storyteller Who Imagined the Horned King

Lloyd Alexander was one of the fantasy authors who inspired me to write story after story as I was growing up.

He died last Friday, and I didn't learn about it until today. What a loss. Alexander's The Prydain Chronicles remains one of the great achievements in fantasy writing... not just for children, but for anyone. The Horned King became a permanent fixture in my nightmares long before Disney's lousy (but visually enthralling) adaptation The Black Cauldron.Read more


Your Favorite Monster

I'm "in the zone." I've "jumped a train." I'm hanging on to the story while it charges ahead.

The sequel to Auralia's Colors has the tentative title Cyndere's Midnight. And I'm going to be writing it on lunch breaks, coffee breaks, evenings, and weekends between now and the end of June.

It's a "fairy tale for grownups"... a sort of Pan's Labyrinth meets The Island of Dr. Moreau meets... um, would you believe Three Colors: Blue?

Anyway, here's how you can help:

Tell me about your favorite monster.Read more


Tolkien would not be pleased.

At the beginning of the trailer for The Golden Compass, New Line boasts about its wildly successful Lord of the Rings franchise. (Interesting, since their president has nothing good to say about Peter Jackson, and won't let him make The Hobbit.)

As the trailer opens, we see the Ring of Power.

And then, to promise us something of equal importance, New Line displays the One Ring transforming into the "aletheometer," an instrument in The Golden Compass that supposedly "tells the truth."

The implication is obvious. The stories, says New Line, stand on equal ground.

How fascinating.

The first is a story that is illuminated by the Christian faith of its writer. The second is a story that was written with the intent of encouraging children to reject the Christian convictions of C.S. Lewis (and, by association, Tolkien too). One stands in glory. The other was crafted to discount the foundation of the first. "I suppose technically you'd have to put me down as an agnostic," said Philip Pullman to The Telegraph. "But if there is a God and he is as the Christians describe him, then he deserves to be put down."

So, yeah... this trailer demonstrates just how blind New Line is to the nature of its own product.*

I do find it ironic that the trailer includes a character telling young Lyra that she was "meant" to have the aletheometer, as if that's a good thing. When the trilogy culminates with the heroes siding with the villains and ganging up on God (at the end, Pullman decided to cloud the issue a bit, but by then his agenda has become painfully clear) to murder him, who, then, "meant" for her to have it? If they don't mean that it's God's will, what higher power are they appealing to? Philip Pullman's trilogy concludes with a re-staging the fall of humankind in the Garden of Eden as a triumph of the highest authority of all... the human will. If anybody "meant" for Lyra to do anything, it would have to be the God that her fellow heroes kill in the end.

The Lord of the Rings reveals, resonates, grieves, and offers hope. It affirms the benevolence of "a greater will at work" than our own, and observes that without that heavenly hope, humankind is doomed to fail. It works through the power of myth, and through suggestion.  His Dark Materials, on the other hand, makes its agenda clear by having its characters come right out and say things like "Christianity is a lie." Its occasionally enthralling flourishes of imagination are ultimately done in by obvious anti-Christian propaganda, and a frightening glorification of that rebellious impulse within the human heart. It categorizes all concepts of authority into That Which Must Be Overthrown... thus elevating our own unstable and flawed will to the level of God.

Heaven help those who don't see the difference.

As I work on my own fantasy saga, I sincerely hope I am not distracted by any particular agenda... beyond telling a good story, that is.

* Hmmm... wait. Maybe the studio folks *do* understand their product after all. Because the Ring of Power was the tool of the enemy... the symbol of pure evil, the symbol of our wicked lust for power. And ultimately, it *is* the Ring of Power that the heroes of Pullman's series embrace.)(Hat tip to Peter Chattaway for the link.)

For more on Philip Pullman, his novels, and his views, check out any of these pages:

The Telegraph

The London Institute for Contemporary Christianity

 "Pullman Don't Preach," The Oxford Student

Facing the Challenge

The Spectator

Peter Hitchens

Pegg Kerr

Journeyman

The Constant Reader

The Guardian

Regina Doman's review


No Country is "Staggering," "Coen's Best Dark Film Ever"

nocountryforoldmen2Oh, but I do hate to say "I told you so."

Jeffrey Wells is reeling, raving, overwhelmed by the new Coen Brothers' movie.

This is going to be a difficult test of my patience. I'm going nuts here. I've got to see this thing.

And check out this review by Charles Ealy:

... nothing short of brilliant.

... Javier Bardem ably captures the pathological menace of Chigurh ... And Tommy Lee Jones, in one of his finest performances, stars as Sheriff Bell, the beleaguered lawman who is only able to watch as the carnage unfolds.

It’s by far the most violent Coen brothers film ever, surpassing the deadpan tree-shredding of bodies in Fargo. And it marks a return of the Coens to Texas, where they set their first feature film, Blood Simple. Like that movie, No Country delights in the unusual minor characters who pop up in scene after scene. You hate to see them gunned down, but you know it’s coming, just like a biblical plague.
...
It’s gratifying to see the Coen brothers turn their attention back to serious cinema. Fargo and Miller’s Crossing have always ranked among their best. And they couldn’t have chosen a better vehicle to get back to their roots.

UPDATE: And now this:

Is No Country For Old Men the best movie of the year, you ask? It's an unfair question, says I, because the year's not even half over. Screw it, I says a moment later, the thing's a near masterpiece.

And this:

It is always a mistake to make a snap judgement on a Coen Brothers movie. Case in point: Sure, everybody loves The Big Lebowski now, but I well remember the stupefaction with which a helluva lot of critics and much of the viewing public greeted it upon its release. Even with something like Ladykillers, their game is always much deeper than you first might think it is. (Okay, with Intolerable Cruelty, not so much.) So I hesitate before I offer that No Country For Old Men, which premiered tonight in competition at Cannes, is three-quarters of a masterpiece. . . .

Throughout, the Coens modulate their tone -- darkness with an extreme undercurrent of the absurd -- perfectly, at least until [Kelly] MacDonald's show-hick mom enters the picture. She's soon gone though, but by that point the picture itself has changed. It turns ruminant, elides what some might consider major high points of the story, and goes for something more deeply elegiac than anything the filmmakers have ever attempted before. I wasn't the only one thrown by this shift, but I want to let it work over me a little more. Even as I'm chewing on it while typing this, I've got a feeling I may be calling Country a full-fledged masterpiece after I catch it a second time. Or maybe even before then.

UPDATED SATURDAY 5/19:
The Guardian:

It's a riveting, blistering bit of work ... The film runs a shade over two hours but there's barely an ounce of fat on it. It's pure narrative, hard, fast and lean, with none of the post-modern japery that the Coens sometimes use to put a distance between the story and the audience.

Midway through, I had this down as the brothers' best film since The Big Lebowski. By the end I was wondering if it might not be their masterpiece.

Okay, at last, here's something less than a rave. But I can't see how faithfulness to the novel could be a problem here...
Hollywood Reporter:

The film attains an extraordinary level of tension as a fiercely dedicated drug runner named Anton Chigurh, brilliantly played by Javier Bardem, pursues a man who has stumbled upon and taken his money. The Coens' typically superior filmmaking sustains the electrifying mood for most of the picture, but they are undone by being too faithful to the source novel by Cormac McCarthy.

But then there's Emmanuel Levy:

Brilliant from first frame to last, Joel and Ethan Coen's ... mesmerizing adaptation of the acclaimed novel by Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Cormac McCarthy, is their best film to date, an undisputed masterpiece that impresses on any number of levels.

... a rather faithful adaptation of McCarthy's novel, its distinctly American themes, its rapid-fire pace, and its inky black comic tone. The Coens are able with their distinctive filmmaking skills to transform McCarthy's rich, wry, resonant, and often humorous storytelling into a bravura movie, based on striking images, crisp dialogue, darkly humorous tone, and splendid acting from all around.

It's hard to imagine a better match for the dusky wit and stark humanity of McCarthy’s characters than the Coens.

Variety:

A scorching blast of tense genre filmmaking shot through with rich veins of melancholy, down-home philosophy and dark, dark humor, No Country for Old Men reps a superior match of source material and filmmaking talent. Cormac McCarthy's bracing and brilliant novel is gold for the Coen brothers, who have handled it respectfully but not slavishly, using its built-in cinematic values while cutting for brevity and infusing it with their own touch. Result is one of the their very best films, a bloody classic of its type destined for acclaim and potentially robust B.O. returns upon release later in the year.

And finally, one of my favorite critics, Kenneth Turan:

This is a completely gripping nihilistic thriller, a model of impeccably constructed, implacable storytelling. All you could hope for in a marriage of the Coen brothers and McCarthy, it's a film that you can't stop watching, even though you very much wish you could as it escorts you through a world so horrifically bleak "you put your soul at hazard," as one character says, to be part of it.

UPDATED 5/21:
Variety's Anne Thompson blogs:

Last night's unveiling of No Country for Old Men lived up to all my expectations and more. It's one of the Coen brothers' most assured films, on a par with their Oscar-winning Fargo or Miller's Crossing, with a touch of the southwestern twang of Raising Arizona. ... The movie also touches the zeitgeist as it expresses a loss of innocence in our culture, a turn to the dark side. The ending is heart-tugging. It's going to be hard to beat for the Palme d'Or. Unless Miramax messes up the movie's fall release ... I see a strong Oscar run.


Crown Video asks about "Through a Screen Darkly"

Here's the latest online interview I've done about Through a Screen Darkly.

Tim Willson of Crown Video asked me some questions.


Revealing Interview with Arcade Fire's Win and Regine

You may have already heard Arcade Fire saying some of these things in other interviews, but this is worth reading anyway.

I would post some excerpts, but if I start clipping my favorite parts, I'll end up clipping most of the interview.


I've Survived the "Steve Brown, Etc" show!

Did you hear my conversation with the wild and crazy guys on the Steve Brown, Etc. show?

That's okay. It's right here. Just try and believe your ears. There's no radio show quite like this on Christian radio in my town.