Why Do Moviegoers Like Garden State So Much?

Spurred on by positive reviews, I spent Sunday afternoon at a matinee of Garden State, and when it was over, I drove home trying to figure out what all the fuss is about. I didn't walk away thinking "Awful." I just kinda went, "Eh. Well. Okay. Saw that movie."Read more


Transcript: Bono talks to Bill O'Reilly

Bono didn't waste words during his talk with Bill O'Reilly, making another impressive appeal for the U.S. to lead the way in addressing Africa's emergency.Read more


Updated again: Superman/Caviezel Madness

LATEST UPDATE: 4:02 p.m.

If you haven't heard about this, see my earlier blog.

Things are getting crazy. Here's my paraphrase of the craziness so far.Read more


Barbie Goes Back to Her Roots. Unfortunately.

In case you haven't ever learned about the origins of Barbie dolls, it's important that you know this:Read more


Greetings from a Looking Closer reader in Georgia. (No, not THAT Georgia.)

I love hearing from readers, especially when they turn out to be old friends... especially when it turns out those old friends have been up to some amazing things!

Greetings from Tbilisi, Georgia!

It's been far too long since I've dropped you a line, but I have continued to be a regular visitor to your Looking Closer website. I love the Blog, too -- what a great idea!

Your review of Zhang Yimou's Hero has me really intrigued. I doubt the film will make it to Georgia any time soon, but I'm going to Scotland next week for a few days of vacation with my family, and maybe I'll try to catch it in Edinburgh this weekend. Sounds like the sort of film that is much better to see on the big screen anyway. Have you seen Chen Kaige's film about Qin Shi Huang, The Emperor and the Assassin? It sounds like it would be interesting to watch the two back to back and discuss their different portrayals of the unifier of China. I recommend that you check it out if you haven't already seen it!

In your review, you write: "Hero also burns with immediacy and relevance. As China struggles with the division between Beijing and Taiwan, Zhang Yimou poses a heartfelt challenge. He acknowledges the value of unification and peace. He knows that militant resistance of the empire's progress can lead only to more violence and loss. But he reminds the viewer that the peculiarity of unique, diverse cultures produces valuable, irreplaceable rewards ... and people."

This feels relevant also to the current political situation in Georgia, which is also a fractured and divided country. There are two regions of the country that broke away and declared independence in the early 1990s -- South Ossetia and Abkhazia -- and the conflicts have been "frozen" for the past 12 years. Now, the new government of Georgia under President Saakashvili has set itself the goal of reunifying the country. Saakashvili himself, who has delusions of grandeur, makes no secret of the fact that his great model is Georgia's most famous medieval king, David the Builder, who unified a divided land, conquered Tbilisi from the Arabs, and made it the country's capital in 1122. But already this summer he has brought Georgia perilously close to war with Russia over South Ossetia, with last week being the most serious crisis so far. Saakashvili talks a lot about the need to respect the unique languages and cultures of the Ossetes and the Abkhaz, but is he prepared to be patient and work peacefully over time for reunification, or is he going to risk disaster and rush in with guns blazing? We shall see.

Life working in a U.S. embassy continues to be nothing if not interesting. I've found that it's exhausting working in a job like this in a country that is undergoing a self-proclaimed "revolution" (the "Rose Revolution," which you have probably heard about this past year in the news at some point or another). While this has been a fascinating experience, I also have really found myself missing the rythms and more relaxed pace of academic life. This summer has felt out of joint, as it's the first time in my life that I haven't just automatically had the summer free. I find I really dislike having to count vacation days!

I've gotten to do quite a bit of travel all over the beautiful country of Georgia this past year, as well as take some fun side trips to countries in the neighborhood. Over New Year's I flew up to Prague and met up with my parents there, and then we took the train up to Berlin for New Year's Eve, which was wonderful. I really love both cities, although they are extremely different from one another -- Prague is quaint, elegant, and extremely beautiful, while Berlin is a real modern metropolis. One of the many highlights for me in Berlin was getting to see Return of the King in English on the big screen, something which I would not have been able to do in Tbilisi. I spent Memorial Day weekend in Kiev with a couple friends from work, including Trinity Sunday at the gorgeous Monastery of the Caves. In July I drove down to Armenia with a couple friends (I have purchased a used Ford to drive around the Caucasus in), and we spent a weekend in Yerevan. It's not a particularly beautiful city, but it has spectacular views of Mount Ararat, which rises up out of the Turkish plain across the border like Kilimanjaro towering over the Serengeti. Earlier this month I drove down to Turkey for several days with an old friend from SPU days who was visiting me. It was my first time in Turkey, too. Wow, what a fascinating place! So many different civilizations piled layer upon layer on top of one another. We only just scratched the surface on this quick trip, but it has left me hungering for more.

Please say hello to Anne for me. Drop me a line when you have a moment. It'd be great to hear from you!

David

-

David,

I can't thank you enough for your letter, which is more interesting than most of the films I've seen this year, to say the least. What I wouldn't give to see some of the things you've seen. Glad I've been able to contribute in some small way to your experience. You definitely contribute to mine!

Jeffrey


Collateral (2004)

[This review was originally published at Christianity Today.]


Why do big screen killers seem so glamorous? It's not the filmmaker's fault, necessarily. We're flawed and foolish people, drawn to power, to independence, to the illusion that we can be gods unto ourselves and keep our hands, hair, suits, and consciences clean.

The villain in Collateral is as devilish a man as we've seen onscreen in a while. He's almost irresistible, always ready with a rationalization, and quick to turn against you in those moments when you try to break free of his influence. It's interesting how much he compliments the cleanliness of the taxicab that he hijacks at the beginning of the film. The devil's not ugly—he likes things clean, shiny, and efficient. That way, nobody tries to look at what's going on underneath.

About halfway through Collateral, the poor, persecuted cab driver turns and delivers an ultimatum to this gun-wielding hit man who has commandeered his car and his services for the night. He describes his hijacker as a man "missing some parts" that are "supposed to be there." In that moment, Max (Jamie Foxx), a mild-mannered driver with big dreams, sums up his cold-hearted passenger.

But the words resonate on another level, because they perfectly describe the distinct acting quality of the man playing the killer: Tom Cruise.

Cruise has always looked like a movie star. But most of his roles—from Top Gun to Days of Thunder to A Few Good Men and The Last Samurai—have been similar: driven champions-to-be, momentarily prevented from triumph, bound to overcome some personal obstacle or loss, and then grinning and glorious in the winner's circle. Cruise's performances always evidence drive and discipline, but little else. They lack complexity or heart. They've got rock-and-roll, but they've got no soul. Cruise is a salesman, relentlessly working everything in his power—especially his smile—in order to please you. The façade never comes down to reveal what's behind it.

Thus, in the superstar's most interesting roles, that opacity and superficiality has been exploited by the director so the audience recognizes how creepy it is. When he played the heartless, arrogant punk in Rain Man who needed a moral mentor, the shiny shoes fit just right. As a spiritually bankrupt bloodsucker in Interview with the Vampire, he oozed vanity and thirst. In Magnolia, he strutted and preened for the cameras, a boasting paragon of chauvinism, a prodigal son too proud to go home.

Now, in Collateral, Cruise has his best role yet. He's wearing a designer suit that deserves its own Oscar. It's cut to a perfect fit, just like his shockingly silver hair. Except for the wolf-grey beard, he looks like he's made out of stainless steel, and when he runs, you half-expect him to morph into Terminator 2's T-1000. His grin gleams with menace. He's as quick and sharp as a dagger in the back, and yet he seems likely to dissipate into the air at any moment, like a nightmare or a chill. Even the character's name—Vincent—carries an air of artistry.

Vincent's in L.A. for one night to kill off five people. To him, they're nobody special, but to the offshore drug-trafficking cartel that hired him, they're key witnesses in a case that could bring down their dirty dealings. All Vincent needs is a cooperative driver who will follow orders, either by bribery or by persuasion with a pistol. Max is the unlucky winner. As they hit the streets, the signage printed inside the cab takes on added significance: "Buckle your seat belt." "Two passengers ride for the price of one."

Max, it turns out, is more interesting than Vincent. He's a hard-working driver who knows the ins and outs of L.A. freeways at night, just as his moral compass knows its way around right and wrong. Despite his twelve-year expertise, he insists the job is only temporary. Someday, he promises, he's going to run a Grade-A limousine service. To keep his dreams alive, he keeps a postcard-photo of a tropical island clipped to his visor. Yet, somehow, those dreams are never tangible enough to get him out of the taxi and into the world of risk and possibility.

Foxx's performance is a revelation: he is completely convincing, understated, and moves effortlessly through a wide range of emotions and conflicts both comical and severe. If his starring role in the upcoming Ray Charles biopic, Ray, delivers on the promise he shows here, he may earn himself an Academy Award. As he watches Vincent's acrobatic immorality, Max's face shifts between wide-eyed awe, horror, angst, and disgust. He feels trapped, and yet each new challenge influences him, altering his character with such subtlety that we hardly notice. He gets frustrated, flabbergasted, humiliated, indignant, and eventually bold, courageous, and cocky; he's even pushed to the point of taking on a cop with a gun in his hand. By the end of the film, he's a new man.

But what kind of man has he become? Has Vincent brought out the best in him, or the worst?

The tense interplay between Foxx and Cruise is perfectly pitched and sometimes quite funny. When cops pull over the killer's cab, Vincent warns Max, "Don't let me get cornered. You don't have the trunk space." When Vincent learns that the hijacking has prevented Max from visiting his mother in the hospital, the film swerves into an inspired tangent of tense comedy that features the formidable Irma P. Hall, who out-performs Cruise just the way she outperformed other Ladykillers earlier this year.

Even when he's pushing his way through L.A.'s crowded nightlife, Vincent is all business. Other people are just objects to shove out of the way. Still, the story draws a few of these nocturnal phantoms into the killer's wake.

Mark Ruffalo delivers a stunning turn as an LAPD narcotics cop who picks up the scent—it took me a couple of minutes to recognize him. He takes a poorly scripted, cookie-cutter character and makes him one of the most interesting things in the film. Bruce McGill, who nearly stole the show in The Insider with his explosive courtroom technique, is great here too as an FBI agent laying a net for drug dealers, looking like a compact-model of Donald Sutherland and snarling like a pit bull. Jada Pinkett Smith plays United States Attorney Annie Farrell, Max's first fare of the night. Smith's warmth and subtlety reveals her true charms as an actress, talents that went unemployed in her Matrix-sequels roles.

The other great performance in this film is delivered by director Michael Mann. Collateral allows Mann to indulge all of his signature flourishes: slow cruises through the city by night, with the lights gliding across the shiny surfaces of cars, subways, and helicopters; a gun for every well-dressed tough guy; a couple of chaotic shootouts. Viewers will be frequently reminded of his previous films from Ali to The Insider, from Heat to Manhunter. He loves a screen divided by horizontals—freeways, rooftops, horizons, and a windshield that's cracked in just the right place so Vincent's visage is fragmented. When Max leaves the cab station, he drives into a panoramic mural of the wild, wild west. Like Heat, Collateral is a tone-poem tribute to the City of Angels—the back alleys, off-ramps, and warehouses we rarely see in films.

Still, Collateral is also Mann's most formulaic work since he turned in weekly episodes of Miami Vice. Granted, that's not his fault. Taking a note from Midnight Run, screenwriter Stuart Beattie pairs a wise bad guy and a simple good guy, binds them together, and has the bad guy teaching the good guy to get his life together. In the last act, you can feel the tires suddenly sinking into the ruts of a routine action flick, spoiling the fluidity, spontaneity, and grace of all that has come before. Finally, the film swerves into a tailspin of clichés culminating in a confrontation that plays like a feeble echo of Heat's last-act pathos. Coincidences pile up on all sides. People we thought we were meeting by chance early in the film suddenly show up in Vincent's plans. You have to wonder if Mann will play a slow-jazz version of "It's a Small World" over the end credits.

These unlikely connections are ironic, considering the film's faux-philosophical subtext about an overpopulated world that makes each life seem insignificant by comparison. You can feel Beattie's script straining for importance as Vincent shoots first and then asks questions like "Does anyone notice?" We're left without any inklings of God or any higher influence. We're left to assume that it's a Darwin world out there, and if there's going to be any love or any care or any meaning, we have to make it for ourselves. The law cannot be trusted. The good man is the one who learns to carry a gun and mete out justice to whatever theme music he chooses.

And yet, the film may strike a chord with American audiences, many of whom feel as if the nation's been hijacked, and that they've been persuaded to carry out the violent agendas of others. If Cruise's Vincent is good at anything (besides shooting and dressing), it's rationalizing. He tries to "sell" Max on his job, his mission, minimizing ethical concerns. When one rationalization falls apart ("I shot him. The bullet and the fall killed him"), he tries relativism, comparing the five people he's killed to mass murders in Rwanda.

The problem is that Mann and Beattie are content to let the Devil win. Whatever Vincent's fate, it's hard not to walk away impressed with his slickness and skill. And it's hard to ignore that, while Max may have learned that life is unpredictable and he needs to "seize the day," he's also learned that it's a whole lot more efficient to carry a gun and work justice as a vigilante than to consider any other source of help.

Collateral reaches for profundity by exploring some existential questions, looking with clinical fascination at the remnants of conscience in its "hero" and "villain." But it ultimately draws few conclusions about right and wrong, and leaves us with the impression that there is no way out of the devil's business. As the music swells during the film's operatic conclusion, there's still a bad smell coming from the trunk of this taxi.


Is Jim Ca-Jesus... Superman?

UPDATE 8/31 : Ain't It Cool now says Mark Millar's story is 100% FALSE.

UPDATE 8/30: Warner Brothers is not yet confirming that Millar's report. But Barbara Nicolosi, prophetess, talked about this a while ago in her blog. To read some crazy responses to the idea, click here...

Original story:

Mea culpa. Nicolosi's rumor looks like it was probably correct after all. I'm in a state of shock.

Can't you see the slogan?

"This time... Caviezel gets to FIGHT BACK."

Mark Millar confirms the rumor.

 


Patty Griffin, Rachel Yamagata... Music page updates!

I've added a review of Patty Griffin's new album Impossible Dream to the Looking Closer music page, along with a few comments on new albums by Rachel Yamagata and Snow Patrol.

And no, I haven't forgotten that I promised an in-depth review of Wilco's A Ghost is Born. That review's taking longer than most; it's a complicated album. But it will be there. Soon, I hope.


Mean Creek - Harsh, Harrowing, Truthful

I've seen Mean Creek twice now, and it improves with a second viewing. It's much more complex, truthful, and intriguing than I thought on the first go round.Read more


"Just Right."

Her blog entries are rare, but Jessica Poundstone's entries at Utopia Parkway are usually gems that I can't wait to share with others. Today's is no exception:

In a story on a new planet European astronomers discovered…

"However, there is the tantalising question as to whether it lies within the "Goldilocks Zone" -- a distance from its star that is not too hot, not too cold, just right."

Meanwhile, my friend and co-worker Margaret Smith, author of Holy Struggle (a profound work of poetry and biography on the life of Gerard Manley Hopkins), noted this poorly-worded headline in today's New York Times:

Abuses at Prison Tied to Officers in Intelligence

And she adds:

"…since the prisoners were often the ones tied up."