Give Judi Dench a Nomination for "Notes on a Scandal"

Watch out. Here comes Notes on a Scandal. And what Hannibal Lecter was for Anthony Hopkins, Barbara Covett is for Dame Judi Dench.

Yikes, what a nasty bit of business this movie is. Count Barbara Covett up there with Tom Ripley on the chart of Malevolent Devils. She's not nearly as clever as Ripley, but her heart is oh so cold.

It'll be some time before I can write up a review on this, but let me give you a bit of caution...Read more


Family Stories: My Conversation with Alejandro González Iñárritu

This interview was originally published at Christianity Today on November 8, 2006.

Alejandro González Iñárritu has a lot of stories to tell. He packs several of them into each film that he makes. In three critically acclaimed features — Amores Perros, 21 Grams, and the latest, Babel — he and screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga have told at least nine, depending on how you unravel his complex tapestries of narrative.

All three films bear the distinct style and perspective of storytellers who are unafraid to portray characters in states of depravity, desperation, and despair. There is a burdensome weight to these pictures, giving us the sense that the world is getting very dark indeed. Hope is not lost, but it only glimmers in the occasional traces of compassion and care.

Born in Mexico City in 1963, Iñárritu has had quite a colorful journey already. He began his creative career as a radio DJ, then began composing music for films. Studying film in the U.S., he eventually crafted Amores Perros, the feature film that would earn him raves and awards around the world, including a Best Foreign Film nomination at the Oscars, and catapult him into the top tier of directors working today. 21 Grams earned nominations for Benicio Del Toro and Naomi Watts.

And now, Babel may earn him his first Best Picture nomination. Babel features unforgettable performances by Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, even as it introduces American audiences to a diverse, international cast. Filmed in Mexico, the U.S., Morocco, and Japan, it carries us around the globe into various crises of violence, loneliness, and communication breakdown. It's almost overwhelming, but we come away thinking about the power of compassion and the need to slow down and pay attention to our neighbors and their needs.

Christianity Today Movies visited Iñárritu during a publicity stop in Seattle to talk with him about his art, the challenges of filming such an international project, and his curious preoccupation with the importance of family.

Films about foreign cultures with wide release in America often feel like postcards—simplistic, often with insulting stereotypes. But Babel feels authentic. What was your approach to capturing each distinct culture?

Alejandro Iñárritu:

I spent one year [trying] to really assimilate, absorb, and be very respectful with every culture. I tried to not judge them, or portray them as stereotypes or cartoonish—you know, the misbehaving Muslims, or the lazy Mexicans, or the selfish Americans. Compassion is the word for this film.

You take us into intimate contact with these characters, so we get a visceral grasp of their broken hearts. And while they're from different cultures, your storytelling suggests there is a commonality to their experience. Is that what you intended?

Iñárritu:

I started out making a film about what really separates us. But during the process I was transformed—and my films are extensions of myself. I ended up doing a film about what unites us.

I want the audiences to forget that they are watching a foreign-language film, about a foreign culture, and realize that they are just watching human beings. I want Brad Pitt to [blend in] with humanity, so he's not Brad Pitt anymore. It's not about celebrities. It's not about movement and explosions. I want the people to really feel the weight of the dead. I want the people to feel the weight of pain.

These many characters never get together on screen; they're not completely connected. But what connects them is not happiness but pain, and the process that they go through to … break down walls and connect to the ones they need and love. These people don't have the ability to express love, or to receive love.

This film, for me, is about compassion. And it's about borders—not specifically the ones that are built physically, but those that are built within ourselves … through prejudice; through stereotypes; through branding people, cultures, ideas, or even ideologies. … I think the only way that we can break down those walls is through compassion. Every time that we judge, or every time that we criticize, we have lost that element. And without that element, we are losing our humanity, I think.

What appeals to you about doing these very complex webs of story?

Iñárritu:

I'm very curious, I guess, as a human being. Every time that I'm shooting a film— even when I'm going to the set, I see some people in the window in the car and I find them more interesting than the ones that I'm talking about. [laughs]

As a Third World citizen, I always feel that I need to express my point of view. Sometimes the points of view of Third World countries are never expressed. We don't have that possibility, sometimes, to spread what we feel and how we see things.

For me, it is important that every character in every film has some words, has some way to express themselves, to be more democratic about the angles [of perspective on] the subject matter, to understand that when somebody does something, they have a reason [for it.]

I've read that you take your family with you when you work. Is it true that you took your wife and kids to Morocco and Japan for a whole year?

Iñárritu:

We went to Morocco, to Tijuana, to Japan. Not the whole year around, but many [trips], yes. The most beautiful thing that I learned, I learned from my kids. They were eight and ten—and they were playing with Moroccan kids in these humble villages, and they were playing with the Japanese kids … because they haven't built those walls that we have as adults. They are basically pure, and they understand each other with their eyes. That's how we are born, but we unfortunately have been poisoned when we become adults. That's a sad thing.

In all of your stories, no matter what the culture, you seem intensely interested in communicating the importance of family relationships.

Iñárritu:

Completely. I think that my films are basically family stories, beyond the fact that they are global and have political and social commentary. At the core of it, Babel is basically four stories of parents and children.

I think we are defined as human beings through our families, no matter what kind of family—through our relationships with parents, brothers and sisters. [You look back to] the first people of the world, and there is Cain killing Abel. In families you can find the source of every human drama. It is interesting because the cell of a society, the cell of a country, the cell of humanity—everything lies in the family.

For me, the most important thing that I have to accomplish, is to be a good father. That's the most difficult challenge of my life. That's the most important thing for me, more than films.

I have dedicated all my films to my family. … The first one I dedicated to the son that my wife and I lost. And then the second one I dedicated to my wife. This one I've dedicated to my kids who are alive. They were part of the process, and I want them to be close to my process, to know who I am, what I do.

The title of the film is a reference to a story in the Book of Genesis, when God punished human pride by confusing our languages. Did you mean for the film to suggest anything about our relationship with God?

Iñárritu:

For me, Babel is about human beings left alone with each other. There's an absence of God. In a way, we have been dealing with the consequences of our own greed, our own selfishness. We punish ourselves with the way we act [toward each other.]

God made very clear what we need to do. And we are the ones that haven't followed those rules. We always complain and get angry at institutions and religions. But it is not religion or institutions—it is us. The problem is us. We destroy everything that we touch. We destroy marriages, parent-child relationships, governments. Before, it was the monarchy that failed. Then, the czars failed. Then, communism failed. Globalization and capitalism are failing. There's corruption in every institution. It is not the fault of God. It is us. This film clearly shows that man is trying to survive, lonely, without God.

Watching your films, I often glimpse Catholic iconography. That seems important to you. Did you grow up in a religious family?

Iñárritu:

I have been raised in a Catholic family. My mother is a practicing Catholic. I went to a Catholic college. So, I always have been close [to Catholicism], and I always feel that [when] people criticize Catholicism, [the problem] is not really Catholicism, but the people in Catholicism.

We're all messed up. It seems like an excuse, to ignore religion because people are bad. It seems like a cop-out to me.

I respect every religion. For me, it is especially important to maintain my interior life. My spirituality, my connectedness. That is the way I think. That is the way I deal with life and tough moments. I keep in touch with something bigger than me. And I connect with people who have an interior life—a connection with something bigger than them. They realize there's a supernatural existence, something we can't understand.

To think that we can understand everything is such stupidity because our senses are so limited. We are so limited that to feel that we can understand the creation scientifically is a little bit naïve. It's very childish.

So, now that you've completed three of these ambitious, complicated films, what's next?

Iñárritu:

I'm developing a [project] that will take me a couple of years more. I like to explore things that I haven't done. I like the possibility of failure. I don't want to be in a comfortable zone.


"Apocalypto": the reviews are in.

So... what did Mel Gibson do with all of that money he made off of The Passion of the Christ? He made Apocalypto. And here's what Christian film critics are saying...

Steven D. Greydanus (Decent Films):

Gibson is a consummate filmmaker, and the action is never less than riveting. Yet as the film repeatedly ratchets up the wince factor beyond what seems necessary or appropriate, it’s hard not to feel that suffering has been reduced to spectacle. The Passion offered a redemptive context for its brutality that seems lacking here. Gibson is still seeking life amid death, but the balance is off.

The final showdown between Jaguar Paw and his detestable archrival is brilliantly orchestrated. But then comes a moment when the bad guy is not quite dead, but not long for this life… and, as he looks up at the hero, a thin jet of blood spurts from the side of his laid-open head, pulsing with his heartbeat. Does anyone want or need to see that?

Read more


"Wings of Desire": Stage Play

My favorite film, Wim Wenders' Wings of Desire, has been re-made once before... as a forgettable, cheezy American romance called City of Angels. Now, it's being remade again, night after night, onstage.Read more


The Weinsteins Start Up Their Own "Faith-Based" Film Endeavor

Great.

Now the Weinstein Company is developing a faith-based filmmaking line.

Since the Contemporary Christian Music has done so much to sidetrack Christian musicians so their music doesn't accidentally end up in arenas where the world might hear it... why not create Contemporary Christian Cinema? That way, faith-related films can play to those who already agree with their messages, and to those who don't want to bother with the challenges of mainstream movies. Meanwhile, mainstream audiences can put even more distance between themselves and films that openly wrestle with issues of faith. They'll spot the "faith" label, feel a shiver run down their spine, and move on to something else.

Walls and boundaries. That's what we want. Neat and easy labels and categories. All the better for judging other people, for staying where we are, for complimenting ourselves on our choices.Read more


Firefly is back. (Sort of.)

With each passing week, it continues to blow my mind that there is nobody out there able to talk sense into a television network and organize the return of Joss Whedon's Firefly.Read more


My talk with The Nativity Story's screenwriter, Mike Rich

My interview with Mike Rich, the guy who wrote The Rookie, Radio, and The Nativity Story, is now posted on the website for Response Magazine.

I've interviewed a lot of writers and filmmakers. Few have been as eloquent as Rich. It was a pleasure to talk with him.Read more


Specials: National Board of What?; Time Out on NY Critics; Battlestar Galactica

"The National Board of Review" - impressive name, no credibility
At Hollywood Elsewhere today, Jeffrey Wells links to Roger Friedman's bit about the National Board of (not-so-credible) Review. Who are they to be naming the Best Films of 2006? Find out.

And speaking of reviewers...Read more


Christian Film Critics Publish "Outrageous, Disingenuous Lies" for God's Glory

This week's Film Forum contains dangerous material.

Christians are giving mixed reviews to The Nativity Story.

Some of them love it, some of them like it, some of them don't like it.

Could it be that a movie might fall short of greatness, even if the story that it tells is the Greatest Story Ever Told?

Could it be that a Christian might still have misgivings about a work of art, even if that art is about Jesus?

Or is it a crime to point out weaknesses in a big-screen version of the Christmas story?

*Dr. Baehr of Movieguide tells us that those who have negative responses to the film are liars, and incapable of dealing reverently with Bible stories.

"The most negative responses to the movie reflect a clear inability to accept any movie that deals reverently in any way with beloved Bible stories like the birth of Jesus Christ," said Dr. Ted Baehr of the Christian Film and Television Commission in a released statement.
...

"Don't buy these outrageous, disingenuous lies," Baehr urged moviegoers in a statement. "'The Nativity Story' brings the Gospel alive in a compelling, captivating, entertaining, and inspiring manner that shatters expectations. It has one of the best scripts of the year."

-

UPDATE #1:

In my first note, I merely repeated what I have read in other responses to Movieguide: That "Dr. Ted Baehr" does not actually have a doctorate. But this time, I was wrong. And I apologize for the error. Apparently, after years of calling himself "Doctor," Mr. Baehr has finally received an honorary Doctor of Humanities degree from Belhaven (a school that, incidentally, does not offer any doctorate programs). Earlier, he was just a JD (juris doctor), which is essentially bestowed upon all law school grads, and never used as a title . . . unless you're Mr. Baehr.

But now that he has been given an honorary doctorate, well, I won't be questioning the claim... anymore.

UPDATE #2:

I have received a corrective from Dr. Tom Snyder of Movieguide, telling me that Baehr was referring only to mainstream critics, not Christian film critics. And Snyder has accused me of pulling Baehr's comment out of context.

But here is the article I quoted, which begins: "Some movie reviews of The Nativity Story bashing the traditional portrayal of the Christmas story left one Christian film critic outraged."

"Some movie reviews" is not specific enough for me to infer that he meant only mainstream reviewers. And whatever the case... is it responsible for a Christian film critic to read some other people's opinion of a movie and declare to the public that they are "liars" because of their feelings about it? Is it admirable to declare that they have "a clear inability to accept any movie that deals reverently in any way with beloved Bible stories" simply because they found The Nativity Story to be flawed artistically? That's what I call presumption.