U2's "No Line on the Horizon" arrives March 3.
Irish rockers U2 have named their new album "No Line On The Horizon," and will release it worldwide in early March, their label said on Thursday.Read more
What's Your Favorite Movie Poster of 2008?
I'm a big fan of movie posters. I surround myself with them at the office, and I have dozens at home as well. My favorites are the original Raiders of the Lost Ark poster, which hangs above the Read more
"The Tale of Despereaux": Read the Book. (Don't Wait for the Movie.)
My review of The Tale of Despereaux is coming to Christianity Today Movies next Friday. For now, I'll just say this: Read the book before you see the movie.
Please. Pretty please. You'll thank me for it. Read more
"Sexiest Man Alive" to host Oscars
I was hoping for Eddie Izzard.
Or Stephen Colbert.
Or John Stewart again.
Oh well. Now I know that my wife will watch the Oscars with me, for a change.
Doubt (2008)
[This article comparing and contrasting Doubt and Frost/Nixon was originally published at Image.]
•
Be sure you get tickets for two of this month's new releases: Frost/Nixon and Doubt. Both films were adapted from celebrated stage plays by their original playwrights. Both are dramatic, intense, and powerfully acted. And you'll find that each follows a crusader obsessed with exposing the ugly truth by wringing an admission of guilt from an abuser of authority.
And yet, they're so very different.
Audiences are already enjoying Frost/Nixon, the latest Oscar-season entry from the Academy Award-winning director of A Beautiful Mind—Ron Howard. Howard directs Peter Morgan's drama about the famous showdown between BBC talk show host David Frost and the former U.S. President Richard Nixon soon after Nixon resigned in disgrace.
This face-off is brought to life by the talented Michael Sheen and Frank Langella. Sheen makes us feel Frost's frustrations just as palpably as he captured the trials of Tony Blair in Peter Morgan's last film, The Queen. Even more impressive, Langella delivers a Nixon of complexity, rage, and fiendish cleverness.
Their interviews are staged like the boxing matches in Howard's previous film, Cinderella Man. And if we're drawn to the edges of our seats, it's not because we don't know how it ends. We all know that Tricky Dick will sink like the Titanic, but there's pleasure in anticipating his spectacular disintegration. We want justice, but we also want the catharsis of seeing a deceitful, manipulative, irresponsible president go down in disgrace.
Howard knows this. And he makes sure that we cannot miss the parallels he's drawing between Nixon's handling of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Watergate, and President George W. Bush's handling of Iraq, Afghanistan, and threats to Americans' civil rights. You can almost predict the political speeches we'll hear at the Oscars or the Golden Globes if Frost/Nixon wins anything.
I'm not saying there aren't parallels. Of course there are. But Howard’s approach seems too easy, and rather unhelpful. Frost/Nixon has all the subtlety of a bumper sticker: “Bush Lied, People Died.” Dubya-haters will nod grimly at this affirmation of their contempt. To me, it felt like easy crowd-pleasing—a gross oversimplification of complicated matters.
Nixon's harrowing moments of self-realization are likely to kindle some pity for the ex-President. But Howard's too keen on giving viewers what they want, so he sends us off with a simplistic and damning epilogue. He tells us that Frost went on to grace the covers of popular magazines, while Nixon's only legacy was that the suffix “-gate” would be given to any event of political wrongdoing.
So the film ends with a cheap shot that allows us to feel smug as the credits roll. It's the kind of thing I've come to expect from Howard, who demonstrates he's learned a lesson that Frost learns early in the movie: “The American people want a conviction, plain and simple.”
It's true. Most audiences enjoy plain, simple convictions. They get them on any number of prime time television dramas every evening.
But perhaps what we want and what we need have been confused. It's one thing to desire justice and then celebrate a criminal's ruination. It's quite another to live out all three elements of Scripture's call to “seek justice, love mercy, walk humbly....”
Doubt, from John Patrick Shanley (his first film since Joe vs. the Volcano), begins when the timid Sister James (Amy Adams) observes the parish priest, Father Brendan (Philip Seymour Hoffman), in some suspicious behavior, and reports it to her superior, the imperious Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep).
But does it really begin there? Sister Aloysius already suspects wrongdoing in Father Brendan, and this only fans the flames of her presumption. She launches into a vigorous investigation, her suspicions congealing into a dangerous certainty. Their inevitable clash is one of the most compelling interrogations since Tom Cruise took on Jack Nicholson in Rob Reiner's A Few Good Men.
But where Reiner's famous showdown ended with the villain losing his composure, and thus the match, Doubt leads us to reflect on the poison of gossip, the wages of arrogance, and the virtues of doubt. Shanley cautions us against hardening our hearts in the name of justice. There's a difference between being right and being, if you will, “damned right.”
I suspect that many will leave disappointed, even upset, by Shanley's refusal to settle for some simplistic “Gotcha!” scene. Just as many were confounded by the lack of closure in No Country for Old Men, so they're likely to wonder if a reel went missing at the end of Doubt. Who wins in the end?
But I need films that subvert my desire to divide people into white hats and black hats. It's cathartic to watch villains exposed, but reading Proverbs 24 this week, I was reminded that it offends God when I rejoice at the destruction of my enemy. Perhaps that's because he has every right to cast me down on my knees for my own failures and mistakes. I should approve of a crook's conviction, but I should also hope for repentance and grace.
Frost/Nixon narrows in its judgmental conclusion. By contrast, Doubt opens up. I come away with meaningful questions, not just an answer I already knew going in. Where one film leaves me looking down at a man disgraced, the other calls me to search my own heart.
Frost/Nixon (2008)
[This article comparing and contrasting Frost/Nixon and Doubt was first published at Image.]
•
Be sure you get tickets for two of this month's new releases: Frost/Nixon and Doubt. Both films were adapted from celebrated stage plays by their original playwrights. Both are dramatic, intense, and powerfully acted. And you'll find that each follows a crusader obsessed with exposing the ugly truth by wringing an admission of guilt from an abuser of authority.
And yet, they're so very different.
Audiences are already enjoying Frost/Nixon, the latest Oscar-season entry from the Academy Award-winning director of A Beautiful Mind—Ron Howard. Howard directs Peter Morgan's drama about the famous showdown between BBC talk show host David Frost and the former U.S. President Richard Nixon soon after Nixon resigned in disgrace.
This face-off is brought to life by the talented Michael Sheen and Frank Langella. Sheen makes us feel Frost's frustrations just as palpably as he captured the trials of Tony Blair in Peter Morgan's last film, The Queen. Even more impressive, Langella delivers a Nixon of complexity, rage, and fiendish cleverness.
Their interviews are staged like the boxing matches in Howard's previous film, Cinderella Man. And if we're drawn to the edges of our seats, it's not because we don't know how it ends. We all know that Tricky Dick will sink like the Titanic, but there's pleasure in anticipating his spectacular disintegration. We want justice, but we also want the catharsis of seeing a deceitful, manipulative, irresponsible president go down in disgrace.
Howard knows this. And he makes sure that we cannot miss the parallels he's drawing between Nixon's handling of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Watergate, and President George W. Bush's handling of Iraq, Afghanistan, and threats to Americans' civil rights. You can almost predict the political speeches we'll hear at the Oscars or the Golden Globes if Frost/Nixon wins anything.
I'm not saying there aren't parallels. Of course there are. But Howard’s approach seems too easy, and rather unhelpful. Frost/Nixon has all the subtlety of a bumper sticker: “Bush Lied, People Died.” Dubya-haters will nod grimly at this affirmation of their contempt. To me, it felt like easy crowd-pleasing—a gross oversimplification of complicated matters.
Nixon's harrowing moments of self-realization are likely to kindle some pity for the ex-President. But Howard's too keen on giving viewers what they want, so he sends us off with a simplistic and damning epilogue. He tells us that Frost went on to grace the covers of popular magazines, while Nixon's only legacy was that the suffix “-gate” would be given to any event of political wrongdoing.
So the film ends with a cheap shot that allows us to feel smug as the credits roll. It's the kind of thing I've come to expect from Howard, who demonstrates he's learned a lesson that Frost learns early in the movie: “The American people want a conviction, plain and simple.”
It's true. Most audiences enjoy plain, simple convictions. They get them on any number of prime time television dramas every evening.
But perhaps what we want and what we need have been confused. It's one thing to desire justice and then celebrate a criminal's ruination. It's quite another to live out all three elements of Scripture's call to “seek justice, love mercy, walk humbly....”
Doubt, from John Patrick Shanley (his first film since Joe vs. the Volcano), begins when the timid Sister James (Amy Adams) observes the parish priest, Father Brendan (Philip Seymour Hoffman), in some suspicious behavior, and reports it to her superior, the imperious Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep).
But does it really begin there? Sister Aloysius already suspects wrongdoing in Father Brendan, and this only fans the flames of her presumption. She launches into a vigorous investigation, her suspicions congealing into a dangerous certainty. Their inevitable clash is one of the most compelling interrogations since Tom Cruise took on Jack Nicholson in Rob Reiner's A Few Good Men.
But where Reiner's famous showdown ended with the villain losing his composure, and thus the match, Doubt leads us to reflect on the poison of gossip, the wages of arrogance, and the virtues of doubt. Shanley cautions us against hardening our hearts in the name of justice. There's a difference between being right and being, if you will, “damned right.”
I suspect that many will leave disappointed, even upset, by Shanley's refusal to settle for some simplistic “Gotcha!” scene. Just as many were confounded by the lack of closure in No Country for Old Men, so they're likely to wonder if a reel went missing at the end of Doubt. Who wins in the end?
But I need films that subvert my desire to divide people into white hats and black hats. It's cathartic to watch villains exposed, but reading Proverbs 24 this week, I was reminded that it offends God when I rejoice at the destruction of my enemy. Perhaps that's because he has every right to cast me down on my knees for my own failures and mistakes. I should approve of a crook's conviction, but I should also hope for repentance and grace.
Frost/Nixon narrows in its judgmental conclusion. By contrast, Doubt opens up. I come away with meaningful questions, not just an answer I already knew going in. Where one film leaves me looking down at a man disgraced, the other calls me to search my own heart.
Frost vs. Nixon vs. Sister Aloysius
My comments on Frost/Nixon and Doubt are up at Image.
An expanded version of this entry will be posted here soon.
Be inspired!
I am trying to complete Cal-raven's Ladder, which is a sort of Pilgrim's Progress tale alongside an exodus story, without any "inspirational speech to the people scene." There have just been too many of those scenes in adventure and fantasy films.
Having said that, if you need inspiration today, I recommend you start here:
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6wRkzCW5qI
The Ballad of Jack and Rose (2005)
A review by Jeffrey Overstreet
●
Writer / Director - Rebecca Miller; Director of photography - Ellen Kuras; Editor - Sabine Hoffman; Production designer - Mark Ricker; Producer - Lemore Syvan. STARRING: Daniel Day-Lewis (Jack Slavin), Camilla Belle (Rose Slavin), Catherine Keener (Kathleen), Paul Dano (Thaddius), Ryan McDonald (Rodney), Jena Malone (Red Berry), Jason Lee (Gray) and Beau Bridges (Marty Rance). IFC Films. 112 minutes. Rated R.
●
It happens again and again--the human endeavor to establish utopia.
The process begins innocently enough. A few people, led by conscience, react against some aspect of society and determine to make a better world. They might be reacting against corporate greed, religious intolerance, bigotry, pollution, sexual misbehavior, political corruption. It doesn't matter much. What happens is that they decide to separate themselves from the problem, to "start the world over," to lay down laws that will make the world safe for good people to enjoy life untroubled by the wicked.
But there's a problem. Separatism can only serve to shut out certain varieties of evil ... if it even accomplishes that. Human beings bring evil with them wherever they go. You can bet that if you're building a wall to shut something out, you're bound to find yourself trapped inside with whatever darkness emerges from your own people.
Many of these utopia-quests pledge to restore the quality of life they once knew in a "better" time." Why? "The '50s were a much more innocent time," some will say. Others will be nostalgic for the '80s. Scripture, on the other hand, counsels us not to talk as if past times were better than these. It's a strange proverb, but there it is.
In Rebecca Miller's new film The Ballad of Jack and Rose, the main character is clinging to the "free love" idealism of '60s hippie culture. He is the last remaining resident of a commune on an island off the northeastern coast of the United States, and he is grieving as the hopes and dreams of that period slip away, just as his own life is slipping away under an unstoppable tide of physical corruption.
Jack (Daniel Day-Lewis) sits on the idyllic hillside near his bunker-like home and watches as the 21st Century encroaches on the borders of his home. He knows his idea-driven neighborhood is running on fumes, and he knows there's little he can do to stop the housing developments, the conformity, the materialism climbing toward him like a tide of termites. But that doesn't stop him from taking out his rifle and firing some shots off at some of those homes under construction.
His daughter Rose watches in a mix of sadness, amusement, and admiration. She has grown up here with her father, and it's just the two of them. She has seen his disillusionment, but she has also come to savor the last days of this quiet, natural, wild wonderland. This is their Eden, or so Jack would like her to believe.
But just as Jack compromises his own ideals by sneaking away to carry on an affair with a sympathetic and spirited woman (Catherine Keener), so this Eden is about to be compromised.
Or rather, as Rose will learn and Jack will be forced to admit, this manmade Eden isn't so innocent after all. For wherever human beings go to try and create a utopia, they will bring evil with them, and they will become the very thing they've tried to escape.
That was the message of M. Night Shyamalan's The Village, and it's definitely the lesson here. Miller's storytelling, clearly inspired by her father's life as a playwright in the '60s, '70s, and '80s, creates a marvelous, rich, heartbreaking story that feels like a form of autobiography crafted into a fusion of fairy tale and cultural commentary. The way she leads us quietly through a troubling tale of a nearly incestuous relationship between father and daughter wisely refuses to turn its characters into monsters... it does something much better. It portrays Jack and Rose as three-dimensional human beings, one a teacher who slowly realizes he's slipping into the clutches of his own evil nature, and the other a student who realizes that her conscience disagrees with the instructions of this giant that she loves.
Daniel Day-Lewis gives the first great performance of 2005 as Jack, making him endearing and frightening, principled and pathetic, a visionary and a tragic hero, a Lear that's a little too in love with his daughter. Camilla Belle is sufficient as Rose, clear-eyed, pale with innocence, fragile, and yet fiercely intelligent. Catherine Keener is somehow more attractive than ever before as Jack's spirited lover Kathleen.
But the film's most memorable and surprising performance comes from Ryan Macdonald as Rodney, the oldest of Kathleen's two boys, who comes to the commune and quickly catches on to the trouble brewing there. Paul Dano, who plays his wicked younger brother Thaddius, is equally convincing as a devil-in-the-making who lures the curious Rose out of her innocence and sets off the anger that's been building in Jack's heart.
Miller has sharp instincts as a storyteller, but her weakness is in loving her strong metaphors too much. Yes, we get that this is Jack's idea of Eden. Do we really need Rose to struggle with her innocence at the site of a tree that has a snake living underneath it? Does she really need to dress like Little Red Riding Hood?
But these are minor complaints. As heavy-handed as the symbolism becomes, it certainly does its job. The true masterstroke of Miller's storytelling comes in the conclusion, when she avoids the cop-out of condemning contemporary culture, and takes a much braver step, a step backwards... letting us see the larger picture: that both the future and the past as rife with corruption, that human beings cannot create heaven on earth.
Where, then, does hope come from? The film doesn't seem to offer a clear answer. But there may be a hint in the moment when Jack comes to realize his own fallibility, when he puts his head in his hands and cries out, "God forgive me!"
It's almost impossible for those who have followed the career of the playwright Arthur Miller, Rebecca Miller's famous father, to watch this film without considering what it implies about the director's relationship with, and perception of, her father. In interviews, Miller is fairly tight-lipped on this subject. It's not very useful, or respectful, to speculate much on that question. But it is worth noting that while Miller's daughter has clearly inherited her father's talents for compelling an audience's attention, she has fashioned that talent into a unique voice, one that hits notes both subtly poetic and tremendously dramatic. There are hints of Shakespearean tragedy throughout The Ballad of Jack and Rose, and there is a naturalistic style that recalls the films of Terrence Malick.
This is only her second film (her first, Personal Velocity, was memorable as well), but Rebecca Miller is easily in the company of Sofia Coppola as one of the most engaging and fascinating American women making movies today. I am eager to see what she does next.
Babe: Pig in the City (1998)
Who would have guessed that the sequel to an adorable, perfect family film would become not only an existential classic, but a triumph of design, characterization, surrealism, and — for some moviegoers, including me — one of the best films of 1998?
Babe: Pig in the City confounded, and quickly surpassed, my expectations. It may not make the younger kids as happy as that magical, original film did. But there's plenty there to keep them entertained and engaged while at the same time causing parents' eyes to widen at the ambitious social and spiritual subtext.
This is a story about the simple shaming the wise, about love humbling the proud and the complicated. It's one of those films where the big-city types scorn the boy from the country and say, "You may think you know what life's about, but you're in the big city now," and then they go on to discover the fragility of their own foundation, the folly of their arrogant presumption.
When Farmer Hoggett (James Cromwell) is injured through a mishap caused by his clumsy but kind-hearted pig, it's Mrs. Hoggett who is on her feet and able to try and save the farm from those nasty suits that want to buy it. She's off to the big city to try to score the fortune that will save them.
But upon arrival in the big city, she abruptly loses the pig, spends the rest of the film staggering from one catastrophe to another, while Babe ends up wandering dark streets surviving narrow escapes from the more dangerous elements of this downtown zoo (and I mean "zoo" literally.) Babe learns quickly that the animal folk of the city are generally heartless, selfish, and they stand back and watch while the innocent are victimized by the criminal element.
But the stout-hearted courage that won Babe fame and fortune on the farm re-surfaces in a place where love and bravery are a new concept. And the animals are soon lining up before him like pilgrims before Christ, or parishioners before their priest. There's even a scene that suggests a communion ceremony, a pardoning of sins, as Babe turns a jar of jellybeans into a feast for the hungry.
In the first film, Babe had something to prove to himself; he had to solve an identity crisis and do what he only he could do, a lesson that bears telling in a hundred thousand stories. Here, he has a tougher task. With the courage of his convictions, he must put his own life on the line, offering it up for the lives of his friends, of the poor lost souls in the mad mad city, whether they understand and appreciate it or not. The symbolism of Babe's Christ-likeness is so solemn and effective, it's awe-inspiring.
And the masses to whom he ministers are not just a bunch of losers; they're distinct characters, including
- the pit bull whose heart is transformed by mercy;
- the tempermental goldfish who may not even comprehend the grace extended to him;
- and the old, melancholy orangutan. This philosophical monkey who lives in the attic and stares out through a stained-glass window searching for enlightenment stands as a sort of King Solomon, crying "Vanity, all is vanity." He's the film's most powerful, memorable presence.
In the final act, Miller makes this near-surrealism all the stranger by re-staging a parody of his own Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome, stringing up the sizable Mrs. Hoggett in a sort of "American Gladiators" combat with gourmet chefs as she disrupts an upper-class event while trying to recover her lost pig. Three-layer cakes come crashing down, balloons bombard the ballroom, people soar on strings, baby chimpanzees dangle from the chandeliers... but somehow it all makes some sort of crazy sense. If he can be faulted for anything, Miller has a little too much fun in the chaos of the finale.
But he recovers nicely, wrapping up the story with just the right note of victory and loss. Not every character walks away into a happy ending, but this is not your normal kiddy fare. This is the stuff of Dickens, told on the scale of Blade Runner and Brazil, with the madcap spirit of The Great Muppet Caper. Built to last.