Today, Seattle Pacific University instructor Christine Chaney is sitting down to discuss Krzysztof Kieslowski’s The Decalogue with her English class. Bravo.
I love it when literature professors expand the territory of their classroom exploration, encouraging students to apply interpretive skills to film. All too often, movies are treated as something we just do “for fun,” on the weekends, with popcorn and soda… as amusement rather than art. (And let’s face it, because we treat cinema that way, we get the cinema we deserve.)
In high school, my English teachers opened up classic literature by exposing us to film adaptations. I remember watching a television mini-series of A Tale of Two Cities. But my senior year, we were invited to watch Babette’s Feast together. (Subtitles and all!) Then, at the end of the year, after we had learned a lot about how a work of art means… we were invited to watch it again, and the experience was revelatory.
Did you watch movies in the classroom? In high school? In college? Which films did your teachers share with you?
Hopefully, your teacher was smarter and more discerning than this one.
My high school World History teacher had us watch Ghandi, The Mission, The Power of One, Kundun, and others to help show the effects of colonization. My senior English professor showed us Cry Freedom after reading “Cry the Beloved Country.” The images of these films and others have stayed fresh in mind my years after I have lost so much of what I learned in high school, and I ended up seeking out these films again later. Kundun actually started a fascination for me with the country of Tibet, and I was able to travel there with SPRINT (SPU reachout international) last summer! I love it when professors and teachers use movies.
Wow! Talk about an interesting movie…. I love animation but this was great… I will have to say that I didn’t understand it clearly but I must say it said more than I can articulate. Good stories do that I think. Like any dream it’s slightly terrifying but telling, usually in a seemingly encryptic manner. Mystery is not the absence of meaning but the presence of more meaning then we can fully comprehend. I give this an A+