This “today’s favorite” challenge is a tough one.

It’s one of my pet peeves at the movies: At the end of most whodunits, the villain corners the hero and proceeds to boastfully *explain* exactly what he did and why he did it. Stupid, stupid villains… always pausing for excessive exposition before dealing out the death blow. They always give the hero just enough time to devise some escape, or the cavalry time to ride to the rescue.

Exposition is a difficult thing for any filmmaker, any storyteller.

What’s an example of a film in which audiences are “filled in” with history or information about offscreen happenings that are essential to an understanding of the larger story?

The first thing that springs to mind for me: Donald Sutherland’s monologue on the park bench in JFK. It’s riveting. It’s one of my favorite scenes in that film. But why? It’s just a character filling in all kinds of details we could never have come across otherwise.

The beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring deals with exposition by giving us a lengthy “trailer for the past,” so to speak… an action-packed sequence setting the stage for the trilogy, a highlight reel of important historical events. That’s easier to do in a movie, tough to do in a book.

As I write the third strand of The Auralia Thread, I’m looking for ways to tease the reader with understanding about the many mysteries yet to be solved before the series is over. I don’t want my characters to suddenly start making speeches that are obviously intended to fill in the gaps.

What films have cleverly addressed the challenge of exposition?

Privacy Preference Center