|
Directed by Andrew
Adamson; written by Ann Peacock, Mr. Adamson, Christopher Markus and
Stephen McFeely, based on the book by C. S. Lewis; director of
photography, Donald M. McAlpine; edited by Sim Evan-Jones and Jim May;
music by Harry Gregson-Williams; production designer, Roger Ford; visual
effects supervisor, Dean Wright; produced by Mark Johnson and Philip
Steuer; released by Walt Disney Pictures and Walden Media.
135 minutes.
Rated PG for some frightening moments and
intense battle scenes.
STARRING: Georgie Henley (Lucy Pevensie),
Skandar Keynes (Edmund Pevensie), Anna Popplewell (Susan Pevensie),
William Moseley (Peter Pevensie), Tilda Swinton (White Witch), James
McAvoy (Mr. Tumnus), Jim Broadbent (Professor Kirke), James Cosmo
(Father Christmas), Kiran Shah (Ginarrbrik), Liam Neeson (voice of Aslan),
Ray Winstone (voice of Mr. Beaver), Dawn French (voice of Mrs. Beaver)
and Rupert Everett (voice of Mr. Fox).
At last, the Pevensies have reached the silver
screen. What a joy to see Peter, Susan, Edmund, and Lucy
the four siblings of C. S. Lewis's
beloved The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe
brought to life so vividly. After
all of the rumors, the fretting about literary fidelity, and the angst
about religious agendas, we can praise director Andrew Adamson and his
fine young actors for developing these "Sons of Adam" and "Daughters of
Eve" into three-dimensional, engaging characters.
There they stand, at a train stop in the middle of
nowhere, luggage in hand, fidgety and nervous. Their mother has sent
them away from bomb-blasted London due to the Nazi threat, and they're
on their way to a safer place in the country. Wasn't someone from the
mansion of Professor Kirke supposed to meet them here and take them away
to their new wartime refuge?
But they're no more nervous than Lewis's countless
fans who worried about a faithful adaptation. Could Adamson pull it off?
Would the film measure up to the hype and expectations? Are these
Pevensies like the children of the book? And above all
did they get Aslan right?
Back at the train stop, watching the road for any
sign of help, young Edmund frowns, checks his I.D. tag, and says,
"Perhaps we've been incorrectly labeled."
Indeed. Many mainstream journalists have treated the
movie as a sort of pending terrorist attack. (The New
York Times alone published no less than six articles throwing fuel on
the fires of speculation that the film was a big right-wing conspiracy,
just as they did with The Passion of the Christ.) But this
movie cannot be dismissed, like so many preachy "Christian films," as
religious propaganda. (Fortunately, The New York
Times admits as much in their positive review of the film.)
And the anxious faithful can relax, as Adamson has done no serious
injury to the narrative's basic outline of sacrifice and redemption.
"The lion's share" of Lewis's meaningful story remains intact.
Adamson, who also directed the Shrek films,
was never much interested in the religious implications of Lewis's
narrative. He, like Lewis, was caught up in the wild imagination of a
timeless fairy tale, which happens to be full of references to the pagan
mythology that Lewis found so rich with reflections of the truth. The
film, which was made under the watchful eye of Lewis's stepson Douglas
Gresham, is best enjoyed as a symphonic and delightful fantasy. It's a
kaleidoscopic vision of fanciful and colorful creatures, fantastic
landscapes, and laugh-out-loud surprises.
Into the Wardrobe
The film literally opens with a bang, as Adamson
smartly starts by depicting the German air raids on London. In that
chaos, Adamson establishes the Pevensies' four distinct personalities
and temperaments in quick, efficient strokes, even before the train
carries them out of London.
Once inside the mansion of the mysterious Professor
Kirke (Jim Broadbent, perfectly cast), Adamson unfortunately skips their
exhilarating exploration... the first of many crimes
against the Professor and his house. He's too eager for the
hide-and-seek game that sends Lucy burrowing into the coat-stuffed
gateway to Narnia's wonders, an excitement we can
probably understand and forgive. After all, we're eager to get there
too.
What happens next is one of the most enchanting
sequences in the history of fantasy filmmaking. For a few minutes,
everything is exactly as it should be. Mothballs. Fur coats. Snow
crunching underfoot. Prickly needles of evergreen. This chapter is
lifted beautifully from Lewis's description, ushering us into his
wonderland with exquisite grace.
Here, young Georgie Henley, playing the role of Lucy,
reveals that she's the film's greatest treasure. If eyes are windows to
the soul, Henley's soul is super-sized. Without her vibrant personality
and mischievous grin, Narnia would lose its lifeblood. She makes Lucy's
awe and delight contagious. (Her glee is quite real: In a stroke of
genius, Adamson arranged for Henley to be carried onto the dazzling
wintry set blindfolded, and the cameras caught her actual response to
its beauty.)
Lucy, still wide-eyed with wonder, then meets Mr.
Tumnus the faun, played by James McAvoy. In an endearing turn, McAvoy
gives the faun delicate humor and a haunted heart, and his interaction
with Lucy is both charming and portentous.
Adamson gives each child a clear and separate
journey. Lucy will lead them, as fairy-tale children so often do, into a
world of discovery, and her faith will be richly blessed. Susan (Anna
Popplewell) will learn that logic and "too much thinking" can prevent
her from apprehending miracles. Peter (William Moseley) is insecure and
easily exasperated, whereas in the book he was
a natural leader; like Peter Jackson's melancholic Aragorn in the Lord
of the Rings trilogy, he must rise to seize a sword and lead the charge
against evil.
Above all, rebellious Edmund (Skandar Keynes)
benefits from the revisions. The boy's obstinacy now seems to spring
from a reasonable source
he's distraught over his father's wartime absence. His attempts
to discredit Lucy's discovery of Narnia are given new motivation and
vitality, and his betrayal of his siblings stings, swells, and aches for
most of the film.
Turkish Delight, of course, baits Edmund to his fall,
served up by the magisterial tempter of this frozen wonderland, the
White Witch. Tilda Swinton plays the Witch with admirable restraint and
intelligence. In spite of her outrageous costumes and an annoying dwarf
attendant who desperately needs a throat lozenge, she's an effective
seductress it's
believable that a naοve troublemaker would accept her cold comfort. Like
Palpatine delivering sugar-coated lies to Anakin Skywalker, the Witch
fools him with what he can't get elsewhere: flattery and promises of
power.
A mere amusement park?
It's odd, however, the way that Edmund gets from
place to place. In the novel, he makes a torturous journey to reach the
Witch's castle. But here, Narnia's landmarks feel about as far apart as
Disneyland's amusement park rides. The castle's just a couple of city
blocks from the beaver dam, which is a quick stroll from the lamppost,
which is just around the corner from the hills where Aslan's entourage
awaits.
But there are deeper problems here. Insofar as the
movie adheres to Lewis's text, it's a knockout. But as Adamson wedges in
original action sequences, he willingly sacrifices far too much of
Lewis's most essential dialogue. Peter Jackson had no choice but to
severely abbreviate The Lord of the Rings in order to contain it in
feature-length chapters, but Adamson's challenge was quite the opposite.
Lewis's story is short, simple and concentrated
every episode,
every line counts,
and there's plenty of time to have included them.
For no good reason, conventional adventure spectacle
replaces the joys of long, memorable sequences like the melting of the
witch's dominion, a woodland Christmas party, and the thawing of
prisoners. Adamson's more excited about inventing a frantic fight with
wolves on a frozen river, and 20 minutes of elaborate, Jackson-esque,
CGI warfare, as if to ensure there's enough material for a video game
tie-in. Lewis, preferring beauty to violence, only gave the war a page
or two.
Those who don't know the book won't find anything
amiss. Those who do will realize that Adamson's excisions do more than
just quicken the pace
they change the nature of important characters.
The beavers, vividly voiced by Ray Winstone and Dawn
French, are a cartoonish but likeable pair. But they're robbed of
significant lines that build our apprehension of meeting Aslan and help
us understand his kingship. The book's devotees will be dismayed to find
that Mr. Beaver is denied his famous speech about Aslan's power and
authority: "Who said anything about safe? 'Course he isn't safe. But
he's good. He's the King, I tell you." (Tumnus and Lucy echo this
sentiment later, but it doesn't serve the same purpose.)
Meanwhile, our dear, benevolent Professor has been
reduced almost to a bit role, with many of his key lines of dialogues
seriously abbreviated or outright dropped. It staggers the imagination
as to why he's been minimized to just a couple of grandfatherly
interjections. An expanded "special edition" is in order.
A diminished Aslan
As for the character we've all longed to see
Aslan
let's face it: He's not the Aslan who gave that novel its bold
and beating heart. He's given a voice of nobility and gentleness by
Hollywood's favorite warrior-mentor, Liam Neeson, but
that voice is far too familiar, and associated in moviegoers' minds with
Batman Begins, Kingdom of Heaven, Rob Roy, and the Star Wars
prequels. Thanks to the animators, he's a beautiful sight, if
not quite as convincing as the CGI characters in Jackson's Middle-Earth.
But Adamson, working with Emmy-winning co-writers Ann Peacock,
Christopher Markus, and Stephen McFeely, has severely altered Aslan's
presence and power in the script.
While other characters' roles have been expanded, the
lion's appearances are painfully brief. He doesn't have the time
onscreen to earn our affection and awe the way we might have hoped.
Where is the counsel he gives Peter on how to be a
virtuous warrior? Where is his Gethsemane-like torment on the long walk
to the Stone Table? Why is it that his enemies do not seem afraid of
him? The Witch gets to be carreid on a litter... but where is Aslan's
throne? Scene by scene, the writers consistently skirt the issue
of Aslan's authority, eliminating most references to his history, power,
and influence. Aslan's father, the Emperor-beyond-the-sea, is never
mentioned. Instead, the lion waxes philosophical like Obi-Wan Kenobi,
mentioning the Deep Magic that "governs" his "destiny." Huh?
Just as Aslan's majesty has been diminished, the
strength of the Witch has been upgraded. She bears little resemblance to
the sorceress who made Mr. Beaver declare, "If she can stand on her two
feet and look [Aslan] him in the face it'll be the most she can do and
more than I expect." In the novel, Jadis went into terrified hysterics
at the mere mention of Aslan's name
here she barely flinches. When they face off, she's fearless. Did
Adamson make the White Witch a more threatening villain to increase
suspense? That's a practical idea. But Lewis would have objected. This
Aslan is essentially muzzled and bound long before the Stone Table
scene.
Still a success
It is a shame to have lost any of Wardrobe's
wonderful resonance. But in spite of some grave errors in judgment,
Adamson's film is still an admirable success. Let's keep things in
perspective: It was once rumored that other filmmakers were moving the
story from London to present-day L.A. after an earthquake, casting Janet
Jackson as Narnia's Witch, and packing Narnia's streets with
wisecracking critters ΰ la Madagascar. Adamson and company should
be commended for respecting Lewis's imagination as much as they did.
Lewis described a story's sequence of events as "a
net whereby to catch something else." While Aslan's intimidating power
and glory has escaped them, the filmmakers have "caught" the essence of
The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. And they've blessed the
holiday season with a first-class family film that will stand tall after
Lewis's detractors have spent their feeble arrows.
(Philip Pullman's criticisms are shown up as more and more ridiculous as
time goes on.)
With its story of a savior who suffered the
consequences for others' sins, and whose power proved greater even than
death, this meaningful myth reflects rays of hope into a culture
paralyzed by the chill of unbelief, where many really would prefer a
winter without a Christmas. Those who respond to the movie's roar by
running to Lewis's book will find Deeper Magic in its pages. Meeting
them there, Lewis himself will lead them "further up, further in."
Jeffrey Overstreet also wrote
about this film for
Response Magazine.
The first book in Overstreet's own
fantasy series, Auralia's Colors, will be published by
Random House in 2007.
Jeffrey's Rating:
B
Click here for an
explanation of ratings.
|