Browser: The Informant! Public Enemies. The dying wish. The real Spartacus. A handwritten Bible. David Brooks on evolutionary psychology.

Finally.

A trailer that makes me want to go to the movies again. I want a whole franchise about this guy.

I’m facing a week so overburdened with work, it’s dispiriting, so I’ll keep this short.

Here we go…

1.

Reviews for Public Enemies are coming in. I’ve seen it. You should too. I’ll have comments on the film soon. Right now, it’s all Raven’s Ladder all the time.

2.

You’ve probably read this story by now, but just in case you missed it, here’s Steven Greydanus recounting the story of the girl whose dying wish was Up.

3.

Who was the real Spartacus?

4.

A handwritten Bible, in the handwriting of 31,173 people.

5.

David Brooks:

Evolutionary psychology has had a good run. But now there is growing pushback. Sharon Begley has a rollicking, if slightly overdrawn, takedown in the current Newsweek. And “Spent” is a sign that the theory is being used to try to explain more than it can bear.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

4 Responses to “Browser: The Informant! Public Enemies. The dying wish. The real Spartacus. A handwritten Bible. David Brooks on evolutionary psychology.”

  1. Julio Ibanez Says:

    I know that feeling very well! Good luck with all you have on your plate!

  2. Heather Says:

    I’m Daniel 4:18. Does that count as a publishing credit? ;)

  3. Dan Says:

    I wasn’t too impressed with Public Enemies. I thought the decision to shoot in digital was a terrible choice for the film, and Mann goes way to far out of his way to paint Dillinger as a heroic martyr. Purvis isn’t even a character; he is a paper thin figure who pops up once in a while and makes what I felt to be some very inconsistent choices. It’s an entertaining film, and not necessarily bad, but if could have been so much more.

  4. AzhiaShalott Says:

    I haven’t seen the movie, but I found Ebert’s review interesting: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090629/REVIEWS/906299997

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.