Tags: Pixar
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 28th, 2009 at 2:50 pm and is filed under Journal. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Yes, you should see it.
10 Responses to “Yes, you should see it.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
May 28th, 2009 at 8:21 pm
Did you see it in 2- or 3-D? And do you have a recommendation which would be better? I think Ebert said stick with 2. Agree?
May 29th, 2009 at 6:23 am
At long last, we behold the face of joy. ;-)
May 29th, 2009 at 7:06 am
Amen.
May 29th, 2009 at 7:17 am
That is pretty much a priceless picture.
And I plan to. :D
May 29th, 2009 at 8:13 am
I saw it in 2D and it was glorious. I look forward to the 3D experience. If pressed, I’d recommend doing that: See it twice and start with 2D so you aren’t distracted from the first encounter with the story.
May 30th, 2009 at 7:26 pm
I was impressed with how non-gimmicky the 3D was.
May 31st, 2009 at 2:37 pm
3D didn’t seem to me to be anything special, if anything it was a little distracting. And if you’re a cheapskate like me, it won’t be worth the extra three dollars my theater charged.
It was indeed wonderful, though!
June 1st, 2009 at 9:10 am
RIght there with you, Jeff: this is one of Pixar’s best.
June 4th, 2009 at 5:22 am
OK, you’ve convinced me to see as soon as I’m able.
Fascinating! \\//
June 13th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Finally saw it tonight. It was excellent. Right on par with Wall-E and Ratatouille, which is amazing. Third year in a row they have produced a fantastic film. And I saw it in 2D; I can’t stand the gimmicky 3D stuff thats being done with nearly all animations now. I find it distracting and done mainly to draw crowds. A movie like UP doesn’t need it to sell at the box office; the quality of the film is more than enough.