<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skip the Oscars this year! Join me, and host a WALL-E party on Feb 22.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/</link>
	<description>The official website of Jeffrey Overstreet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-173662</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-173662</guid>
		<description>oh man. i forgot about THE FALL. hmmm. i guess i am pretty mad now that you mentioned it.

rewrite of Forest Gump. hahaha. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man. i forgot about THE FALL. hmmm. i guess i am pretty mad now that you mentioned it.</p>
<p>rewrite of Forest Gump. hahaha. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-173082</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-173082</guid>
		<description>Several comments I could give here, but can I ask one question?

Did you review &lt;i&gt;The Reader&lt;/i&gt;? If so, I must have missed it. 

Don&#039;t wanna be another sour grape muncher. Thanks for the comic relief, Seth. One of the best one-liners I&#039;ve read in a comments section in quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several comments I could give here, but can I ask one question?</p>
<p>Did you review <i>The Reader</i>? If so, I must have missed it. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wanna be another sour grape muncher. Thanks for the comic relief, Seth. One of the best one-liners I&#8217;ve read in a comments section in quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-173022</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-173022</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m down with all the disappointment over Wall-E. Taken as a piece of thought-provoking film, character development, and storytelling, it was peerless this year. And the comment about &quot;sour grapes&quot; would be witty if it made any sense at all. The &quot;sour grapes&quot; phrase is supposed to be used in the context of one&#039;s own accomplishments being not recognized. The reason most of us are upset that Wall-E was snubbed springs from the larger issue - the Academy spiralling into its own irrelevance and losing more and more people every year. It seems the majority of the people who get caught up in Oscar fever are people who diligently see the movies nominated because they feel they SHOULD. I used to be one of those. Now, I only seem to have time for movies I want to see (that and the movies Jeff recommends, of course, wink). My two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down with all the disappointment over Wall-E. Taken as a piece of thought-provoking film, character development, and storytelling, it was peerless this year. And the comment about &#8220;sour grapes&#8221; would be witty if it made any sense at all. The &#8220;sour grapes&#8221; phrase is supposed to be used in the context of one&#8217;s own accomplishments being not recognized. The reason most of us are upset that Wall-E was snubbed springs from the larger issue &#8211; the Academy spiralling into its own irrelevance and losing more and more people every year. It seems the majority of the people who get caught up in Oscar fever are people who diligently see the movies nominated because they feel they SHOULD. I used to be one of those. Now, I only seem to have time for movies I want to see (that and the movies Jeff recommends, of course, wink). My two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Von Bieker</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172992</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Von Bieker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172992</guid>
		<description>I too am disheartened. But I won&#039;t add my loud voice to the din. I already blogged about it. 

I will silently pout instead. And plan an anti-Oscar party! What a great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am disheartened. But I won&#8217;t add my loud voice to the din. I already blogged about it. </p>
<p>I will silently pout instead. And plan an anti-Oscar party! What a great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172922</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172922</guid>
		<description>The Reader was nominated because there were so many Holocaust movies out this year, that it would just be terrible for Hollywood not to nominate one...Holocaust movies are award gold. 

Incidentally, any Extras fans here? Remember Kate Winslet in the premiere, doing a Holocaust drama and cynically noting that she was only doing it because Holocaust movies get Oscars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reader was nominated because there were so many Holocaust movies out this year, that it would just be terrible for Hollywood not to nominate one&#8230;Holocaust movies are award gold. </p>
<p>Incidentally, any Extras fans here? Remember Kate Winslet in the premiere, doing a Holocaust drama and cynically noting that she was only doing it because Holocaust movies get Oscars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth H.</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172902</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172902</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s getting pretty loud in here, what with everyone ferociously munching on their sour grapes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s getting pretty loud in here, what with everyone ferociously munching on their sour grapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chessncoffee</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172822</link>
		<dc:creator>chessncoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172822</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I decided to compare the Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic ratings of the five best picture nominees with WALL-E&#039;s ratings.  WALL-E better ratings on both sites than any of the nominees.

I also thought it was interesting that The Reader has such low ratings for a Best Pic nominee- 60% on RT and 59 on Metacritic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I decided to compare the Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic ratings of the five best picture nominees with WALL-E&#8217;s ratings.  WALL-E better ratings on both sites than any of the nominees.</p>
<p>I also thought it was interesting that The Reader has such low ratings for a Best Pic nominee- 60% on RT and 59 on Metacritic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Landes</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Landes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172762</guid>
		<description>And where oh where were the Fireproof nominations for Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Screenplay...

I&#039;ll watch for the chance to see Richard Jenkins and Thomas Newman and Danny Boyle accept their first Oscars. I don&#039;t understand why Millions, on this site, is deemed so much better than Slumdog Millionaire--the latter film was moving and managed to generate suspense when I ought to have known how it would end. Riveting entertainment and an especially rollicking soundtrack.

How can I do an Oscar night screening of Rachel Getting Married if the DVD isn&#039;t being released until March 17th? Do we rent a hotel room and try to access it through their pay TV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And where oh where were the Fireproof nominations for Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Screenplay&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll watch for the chance to see Richard Jenkins and Thomas Newman and Danny Boyle accept their first Oscars. I don&#8217;t understand why Millions, on this site, is deemed so much better than Slumdog Millionaire&#8211;the latter film was moving and managed to generate suspense when I ought to have known how it would end. Riveting entertainment and an especially rollicking soundtrack.</p>
<p>How can I do an Oscar night screening of Rachel Getting Married if the DVD isn&#8217;t being released until March 17th? Do we rent a hotel room and try to access it through their pay TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T Chattaway</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172742</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T Chattaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172742</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, Brett, I preferred Winslet in &lt;i&gt;The Reader&lt;/i&gt; -- but that might be because I found her character in &lt;i&gt;Revolutionary Road&lt;/i&gt; so annoying that I responded as though it were the actress who was annoying. That&#039;s just one of many things that I&#039;d revisit if I had time to do a round of second viewings.

Also for what it&#039;s worth, when the local film critics group did its awards, I nominated Winslet for &lt;i&gt;The Reader&lt;/i&gt;, but she ended up being nominated for &lt;i&gt;both&lt;/i&gt; performances (that is, one nomination for two movies, rather than two separate nominations), and I made a point of voting for someone else just because I didn&#039;t care to honour &lt;i&gt;Revolutionary Road&lt;/i&gt; or her performance therein. She won anyway, though.

Count me among the people who like the &lt;i&gt;idea&lt;/i&gt; of &lt;i&gt;Gran Torino&lt;/i&gt; better than the film itself. As for &lt;i&gt;The Dark Knight&lt;/i&gt;, I like it a lot, and it will almost certainly make my top-ten list, but there are just enough &quot;issues&quot; to be had with the film that I don&#039;t begrudge the Academy or anyone else for leaving it out of the top five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Brett, I preferred Winslet in <i>The Reader</i> &#8212; but that might be because I found her character in <i>Revolutionary Road</i> so annoying that I responded as though it were the actress who was annoying. That&#8217;s just one of many things that I&#8217;d revisit if I had time to do a round of second viewings.</p>
<p>Also for what it&#8217;s worth, when the local film critics group did its awards, I nominated Winslet for <i>The Reader</i>, but she ended up being nominated for <i>both</i> performances (that is, one nomination for two movies, rather than two separate nominations), and I made a point of voting for someone else just because I didn&#8217;t care to honour <i>Revolutionary Road</i> or her performance therein. She won anyway, though.</p>
<p>Count me among the people who like the <i>idea</i> of <i>Gran Torino</i> better than the film itself. As for <i>The Dark Knight</i>, I like it a lot, and it will almost certainly make my top-ten list, but there are just enough &#8220;issues&#8221; to be had with the film that I don&#8217;t begrudge the Academy or anyone else for leaving it out of the top five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan H.</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2009/01/dont-bother-coming-here-for-oscar-nomination-news/#comment-172732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.org/?p=62252#comment-172732</guid>
		<description>I fail to see how these nominations are any worse than usual.

Furthermore, I don&#039;t think WALL-E is that great. It&#039;s as over-hyped as any single film from the past year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how these nominations are any worse than usual.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I don&#8217;t think WALL-E is that great. It&#8217;s as over-hyped as any single film from the past year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

