<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Specials: &#8220;Watchmen&#8221;, Nick Cave, Soul Junk and Woven Hand, Christianity, Auralia&#8217;s ads, and Sam Phillips (1994)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingcloser.org/2007/11/specials-watchmen-nick-cave-soul-junk-and-woven-hand-christianity-auralias-ads-and-sam-phillips-1994/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2007/11/specials-watchmen-nick-cave-soul-junk-and-woven-hand-christianity-auralias-ads-and-sam-phillips-1994/</link>
	<description>The official website of Jeffrey Overstreet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KnightOwl73</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2007/11/specials-watchmen-nick-cave-soul-junk-and-woven-hand-christianity-auralias-ads-and-sam-phillips-1994/#comment-128182</link>
		<dc:creator>KnightOwl73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/specials-watchmen-nick-cave-soul-junk-and-woven-hand-christianity-auralias-ads-and-sam-phillips-1994/#comment-128182</guid>
		<description>Again regarding &quot;Watchmen,&quot; they need to not try to &quot;update&quot; the story or try to work modern politics into it.  &quot;Watchmen&quot; was written and published as a commentary on 1980&#039;s politics, among other things, and it should stay that way.

Also, like other great comic book stories, it&#039;s about the characters, not about the super powers or the spectacle.  As opus indicated, it&#039;s complex and intricate, with extensive symbolism.  That was accomplished very well in a visual medium that gives the reader time to digest the finer points of the story, both verbally and visually.  For the movie to succeed, it will need to take those things into account for both the first-time viewer and the viewer who&#039;s seeing it for the fourth time and wants to still be picking up fresh nuances.

As Peter Jackson and others have shown, the source material is popular for a reason and when left mostly untampered-with, the final product can be just as good in its own medium.  Fortunately, it sounds as though that is the direction things are going with the production.  Hopefully Snyder can be as faithful with &quot;Watchmen&quot; as he tried to be with &quot;300.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again regarding &#8220;Watchmen,&#8221; they need to not try to &#8220;update&#8221; the story or try to work modern politics into it.  &#8220;Watchmen&#8221; was written and published as a commentary on 1980&#8242;s politics, among other things, and it should stay that way.</p>
<p>Also, like other great comic book stories, it&#8217;s about the characters, not about the super powers or the spectacle.  As opus indicated, it&#8217;s complex and intricate, with extensive symbolism.  That was accomplished very well in a visual medium that gives the reader time to digest the finer points of the story, both verbally and visually.  For the movie to succeed, it will need to take those things into account for both the first-time viewer and the viewer who&#8217;s seeing it for the fourth time and wants to still be picking up fresh nuances.</p>
<p>As Peter Jackson and others have shown, the source material is popular for a reason and when left mostly untampered-with, the final product can be just as good in its own medium.  Fortunately, it sounds as though that is the direction things are going with the production.  Hopefully Snyder can be as faithful with &#8220;Watchmen&#8221; as he tried to be with &#8220;300.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opus</title>
		<link>http://lookingcloser.org/2007/11/specials-watchmen-nick-cave-soul-junk-and-woven-hand-christianity-auralias-ads-and-sam-phillips-1994/#comment-128172</link>
		<dc:creator>opus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingcloser.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/specials-watchmen-nick-cave-soul-junk-and-woven-hand-christianity-auralias-ads-and-sam-phillips-1994/#comment-128172</guid>
		<description>Regarding &quot;Watchmen,&quot; I&#039;m excited but also very nervous. I really hope that they somehow manage to capture the complex, overlaying plot in some semblance. And that they do justice to the themes of power and responsibility, of man&#039;s inclination and desire to do gross evil in order to bring about something noble.

Regarding the Soul-Junk/Woven Hand collaboration, it&#039;s not actually a collaboration. The two artists were working on their own, new albums. Which, on the one hand is kind of disappointing. But hey, new Soul-Junk and Woven Hand albums! And that ain&#039;t nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;Watchmen,&#8221; I&#8217;m excited but also very nervous. I really hope that they somehow manage to capture the complex, overlaying plot in some semblance. And that they do justice to the themes of power and responsibility, of man&#8217;s inclination and desire to do gross evil in order to bring about something noble.</p>
<p>Regarding the Soul-Junk/Woven Hand collaboration, it&#8217;s not actually a collaboration. The two artists were working on their own, new albums. Which, on the one hand is kind of disappointing. But hey, new Soul-Junk and Woven Hand albums! And that ain&#8217;t nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

